|
| 30 May 2013 03:28 PM |
I, 1Fireblade1, War Commander of RSF, here-by state the Conditions of Surrender to be proposed to NFC's High Command:
1. The NightFall High Command shall issue orders for all troops to lay down arms towards RSF, it's allies and TRA members.
2. NFC have to formally state that they have officially surrendered on the C&G, when they stated on the C&G as well that they originally declared war.
3. The NightFall High Command must write an official apology to RSF for breaking a once strong alliance between the two clans.
I shall also urge the High Command of NFC to consider this proposal in the interest of the future and preservation of NFC.
- RSF 2iC War Commander Head of High Ranks Commander of the Final Battle Team
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:29 PM |
heh
[:|Avanxious;Lead-General///HeadOfElites///HeadOfTraining;Wetheskeyisbeast|:] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Reburm
|
  |
| Joined: 09 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12267 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:30 PM |
NOOOOOO I WANTED A FINAL BATTLE :( WHYY WHY
when ur words mean nothing, i go la la la |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Allocated
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 26321 |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:30 PM |
Nice job, 1fire.
Though can we get the alliance back :c?
♜ ͡star trekt ●_● |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:32 PM |
| I can't see an alliance just after the war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:33 PM |
| Can we just settle this with a final battle? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Allocated
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 26321 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:34 PM |
Final battles are dumb when one side is way ahead.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:34 PM |
| At the start of the War Fruitbox stated we shall not have a Final Battle when we are so far in front on wins. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Allocated
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 26321 |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:34 PM |
yeah, an FB's illogical, considering rsf's raid wins
and don't worry 1fire i'm joining after the war
♜ ͡star trekt ●_● |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ezaiahs
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18613 |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:35 PM |
your funny
Only reason why you had a chance in this war was due to your unfair base, and how whenever you raid us, the server magically lags to the point where NFC slowly crashes one by one
The old lie: "Dulce et Decorum est Pro patria mori." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:35 PM |
woo
nfc must thank us nowwww
[UAFCOL]Fireman658 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:36 PM |
| NFC surrender or face our wrath. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
HD188753
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5021 |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:36 PM |
| not particularly impressed with either clan |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:36 PM |
@Ezaiah NFC declared war on RSF. NFC should have been aware of the 1 touch terminal. There is no reason to complain to RSF. Complain to NFC HRs for declaring war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:38 PM |
I can't believe you're blaming the lag at Virium on us. XD
Don't you think it would make more sense to blame the constant spam of Riders? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:39 PM |
| That happened in the FEARVs SC war. They went to war then became allies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HD188753
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5021 |
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:40 PM |
> lag at Virium on us
but RSF fort lags more than NFC fort
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2013 03:40 PM |
NO!
TRAE will have a battle with NFCE.
If Wanna ever becomes active and accepts our request. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|