|
| 24 May 2013 08:58 PM |
I'll add on some more tomorrow when I get a chance to discuss with ToberDam.
----------------------------------------------------
First of all, flaming is part of clans and if you can't deal with it, then you're basically a sensitive kid, or you're looking for a reason to ban raiders. There is no reason to have a rule banning flaming at bases.
Second, declining wars is pathetic. If you want to decline wars, then you're not a war clan. If a clan isn't worth your time, then prove it. Don't be an ignorant little wuss.
Third, raid time limits. Completely useless and again just serving as a scapegoat incase a clan is about to lose a raid.
Fourth, stop allying ALL of your competition. Bullying smaller and weaker clans with a ton of allies does not help anybody. Your clan will not get stronger by doing this, nor will your allies. Fight your own wars.
Fifth, stop ending wars after 1 week with final battles. Primarily, final battles should never be used ever. Deciding a war with a small scrimmage which is based on luck if the two teams are even is stupid. If you are incapable of winning raids and defenses, then that's your problem. Begging for a final battle is pathetic.
Sixth, form more rivalries and create more enemies for your group. The US was at its best when they had the Soviets staring them down. After the Soviet Union collapsed, well, you know the rest. Rivalries are extremely good for groups and help activity, loyalty, and fun in general.
---------------------------------- More to come tomorrow.
Join RAA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:01 PM |
| quick edit: overpowering with allies is bad. Getting a bunch of allies against someone else's is ok |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:10 PM |
Agree with all but I don't really disagree with the concept of final battles - I think to say they aren't fair or an accurate representation could be returned with the argument of bases varying in fairness. There should at least be a system in place to scrutinise bases, for example, I would not go to war with VAK under any circumstance, not because they are skilled or strong in numbers, simply because their bases are unreasonable.
Other than that though I agree with all suggestions, and even the suggestion mentioned if there was a system whereby bases were scrutinised.
Oh and also I'm not again allies, but I am against the whole sort of WIJ-TRA-TGI domination alliance, not that all three groups could take me, but when you think of the less able, e.g. RAT, UAF, X-101st you realise they'd stand little chance against such alliance. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
| |
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
| |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:11 PM |
| shutup emall you're just mad RAA beat TF |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fred man
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2006 |
| Total Posts: 8403 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:12 PM |
vak's base isn't even that hard
and i can't gun fight |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:13 PM |
@fred
Win a raid, screen shot, send it to me, I will give you 1000 robux - no joke.
Given that no exploit is involved. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bladez44
|
  |
| Joined: 09 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 828 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:14 PM |
| I agree with everything but the statement that says if you decline a war request your a sissy. Sometimes clans need time to regroup and train what they need to be fixed. Declining war isn't sissy-like, it's strategic. Declining EVERY war is another story though... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:14 PM |
VAK's base is ridiculous
Atleast lower the time and remove that stupid gun recoil |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fred man
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2006 |
| Total Posts: 8403 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:14 PM |
" Win a raid, screen shot, send it to me, I will give you 1000 robux - no joke.
Given that no exploit is involved. "
i have 5-6 on this computer or the one at home idk which |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:15 PM |
| It has to be since the dynamic lighting update. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fred man
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2006 |
| Total Posts: 8403 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:19 PM |
didnt they remove sword jumping?
I haven't checked the base but I guess I'll have to wake a few people up , and show them how I used to get to ATAC roof w/o sword jumping
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:34 PM |
| Lol I used to get on ATAC roof, you would jump off the ledge and onto the side of the main building, then climb along to the bridge area, hat jump over the invisible wall on the bridge and then proceed to jump up onto the ATAC building side and climb to the top. The red bricks on the ATAC roof killed though, that was a major sadness. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2013 09:36 PM |
This is exactly my thoughts, actually. But put into words. 'Third, raid time limits.' If the raid lasts 3 days... there should be an end, or restart it and stuff...
Take the cow, it's our only hope! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|