|
| 22 May 2013 04:13 PM |
You call is inactive because it's true? Sasuke, RAA is far more inactive. Someone I know in RAA told me you guys barely do anything, and even people complain on the wall about lack of trainings/events. Truly saddening...*sniff* ---------------------------- and yet we field 20 people at your base and 0 VL show up |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:14 PM |
It actually proves something.
It proves that there is great activity within that group.
I doubt that in 25 vs. 5, the 5 would win.
[-UDontKnowNothing-] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gallorax
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 10 |
|
| |
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:18 PM |
"You call is inactive because it's true? Sasuke, RAA is far more inactive. Someone I know in RAA told me you guys barely do anything, and even people complain on the wall about lack of trainings/events. Truly saddening...*sniff* ---------------------------- and yet we field 20 people at your base and 0 VL show up"
> It's seems saying something once doesn't get it through your head. Let me say this very slowly....and very understanding so you can understand ok?....
Valor Legion High-Ranks were offline at the time, due to real life occurrences. So we could not shout for anyone to come at the time. So if you are calling us inactive just because of one raid we were unable to shout, then you are nuts. RAA can't even get any trainings or raids in lol (And people in RAA have told me to, don't deny it)
xddd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zealots
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14002 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:18 PM |
sas, a group can be active, but you can't expect 15 or so members at the base 24/7
~Grand Master (14,022+ posts) "You are no more of a king then the boil on my arse" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:19 PM |
RAA can't even get any trainings or raids in lol (And people in RAA have told me to, don't deny it) ------------------------------------- we got 20 at the raid i hosted, scrub
call RAA inactive when you can atleast get 1 person to a defense |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:19 PM |
^ Agreed Zealots He apparently doesn't understand that lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:20 PM |
sas, a group can be active, but you can't expect 15 or so members at the base 24/7 ------------------------------- i wasnt expecting them to because theyre inactive
but i was expecting maybe 5 people |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:21 PM |
"RAA can't even get any trainings or raids in lol (And people in RAA have told me to, don't deny it) ------------------------------------- we got 20 at the raid i hosted, scrub
call RAA inactive when you can atleast get 1 person to a defense"
> That was when? From what I heard, nothing has been barely going on for the last two weeks. And you probably only hosted the raid once during that entire duration. I keep laughing because you keep saying RAA is fully active and equipped when actual RAA members are telling me otherwise. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:21 PM |
The fact that NONE came is why they're inactive. It's sad really. I was looking foward to the raid. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
| |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:22 PM |
those actual RAA members are probably inactive within the group
the reality is i dont give a damn what they say; we still raided you with 20 people and VL didnt have any defenders. inactive. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:22 PM |
You cannot claim a clan inactive just because we couldn't attend one defense. That's completely bias xddddd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:24 PM |
| Not our fault all of our members come to raids. Just because your players aren't there to help defend doesn't mean VAK has no skill. It's on you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:24 PM |
@Sasuke
Oh, I'm pretty sure they are inactive, cosnidering eveyrone is in there. And I'll give you a tiny hint, I even asked a HR: And that HR admitted to saying that the group is completely inactive at the moment lol.
By the way: I love how you are using one small event you had, and majorly claiming that VL is inactive due to a one time occurrence. Very sad xdddd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
timz56
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7156 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:24 PM |
| lol sasuke ur such a hypocrite |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:25 PM |
im just going off of what we have
and what we have is RAA fielding 20 raiders to fort tor and 0 VL showing up
then we have a VL HR flaming and calling RAA inactive on the forums. doesnt look very good does it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:26 PM |
The group isn't inactive. We're rebuilding anyhow, it doesn't matter atm. Fact is, your op. You're inactive, stop trying to make yourself look better trying to put RAA down, when yo clearly can't. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:27 PM |
| Filling up a server proves you have large mass. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:27 PM |
| RAA is inactive by my standards. However, we have a group of about 15 loyal RAA who are able to be fielded at all times no matter what the situation of the group. VL is inactive. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
| |
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:28 PM |
"im just going off of what we have
and what we have is RAA fielding 20 raiders to fort tor and 0 VL showing up
then we have a VL HR flaming and calling RAA inactive on the forums. doesnt look very good does it"
*Looks at the beginning of the forum*
Technically, I am defending Valor Legion against a hypocrite. You started the flame on here, and I am merely defending my clan, lol.
Oh by the way...if you are going off for what you have: That's a VERY small of amount of evidence or whatever you have that proves VL is inactive. On the other hand, I have even key-witnesses in RAA that even say you are inactive. Stop trying to ignore the fact you are inactive, and turning this discussion around. Lol
And I would say this looks pretty excellent. Considering you can't even make a good comeback Keep trying, buddy! xdddd
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:29 PM |
they said its inactive and yet we field 20 RAA and VL fields 0
weird |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:29 PM |
It's just a game. Calm down.
[-UDontKnowNothing-] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gargix
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3501 |
|
|
| 22 May 2013 04:30 PM |
The truth of it is, if its a 30 player server and both teams have 15, the defending side will ALWAYS win, because NO FORT is 100% fair. Filling up numbers isn't flooding as such.
Think about it like this,
VAC+VAK = 3000 people MAXIMUM
When VAK raids, we have 30 people at the raid, AND another 15-25 back at SMO!!
Lets say that's about 50-55 soldiers actively doing something, Therefore taking a clan such as NFC, FEAR etc, and by doing the maths they should have around 1000 defending, but sadly they don't, usually they have 11-12, if they are lucky. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|