Flame6264
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3379 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:19 PM |
| I'm Slenderman I GetChildren() |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dr01d3k4
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 17916 |
|
| |
|
Flame6264
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3379 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:21 PM |
| Ohai there! You know me right? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
itunes89
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1957 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:22 PM |
| Please you and you jokes. Get out.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Flame6264
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3379 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:24 PM |
| You both are writers on LA! Along with me! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:51 PM |
Hey finally someone with a sence of humor on the scripting page! :D
I laughed at the joke. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Flame6264
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3379 |
|
| |
|
Fedorakid
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7079 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:54 PM |
| Yeah...It was actually a good joke :/ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MrNicNac
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 26567 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 04:58 PM |
| To even begin, you have to FindFirstChild() and make sure nobody following you IsAncestorOf() that child. If it IsDescendantOf then you can try to get that one too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 05:07 PM |
I like my joke better
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Destroy() people with home-made bombs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Fedorakid
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7079 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 03:51 AM |
| Haha nicnac's was even better. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 03:54 AM |
ClearAllChildren()
What children? I see no children here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zars15
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9999 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 05:36 AM |
| Let's just GetChildren() and sit them at {} in pairs(). We have to warn them that there is evil bug in script.Source, so let's just hide them under shared table! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 06:47 AM |
Oh no! Our power script.Source is running out! Quick, GetChildren() to the Instance.new("Fire") furnace so we can make Instance.new("Smoke") and generate power.
Once all ChildRemoved, I can go back in my time machine and mak AncestryChanged so there are more children for the Instance.new("Fire"). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
200AB
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1604 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 07:45 AM |
| ...What exactly are your laws of time travel? Generally that would never ever work. If you killed one of the kids that you killed's ancestor, then the original kid wouldn't ever have existed, so that would create a paradox. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zars15
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9999 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 07:48 AM |
| Yes, but only problem of your statement is that prehistoricman never said anything about 'killing'. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
200AB
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1604 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 07:49 AM |
@zars15 If you throw humans in a fire, they usually burn to death. The exception to this is if they have protective clothing on, but then they wouldn't feed a power source, therefore they would have to burn. Your argument is invalid. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:04 AM |
Lol.
One skid posted a joke that I barely considered funny. The other skid says it was an awesome joke. Then the Scripters eat the thread! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:12 AM |
'If you killed one of the kids that you killed's ancestor, then the original kid wouldn't ever have existed, so that would create a paradox.'
You misunderstand time travel and related paradoxes. By killing ancestors, you create an alternate reality where the kid still exists but their ancestors never existed.
Weird stuff, I know. But it's the best these science guys can think of. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:16 AM |
function hue() delay(1,while wait(1) do function() hue() end end) end |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:19 AM |
Radio... Ummm... while loops aren't like function delay is angry |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
200AB
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1604 |
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:20 AM |
@Prehistoricman I completely disagree. That perception of time travel is ridiculous, and makes no sense. The "kid" would no longer be the same at all due to the change in heritage, so therefore it would not be the same "kid" as the original.
Nothing about time travel is certain at this point, because as of now (and the perceivable future) time travel is impossible. So, I believe in a different set of time travel laws. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2013 08:26 AM |
'This theory would also apply if a person went back in time to shoot himself, because in the past he would be dead as in the future he would be alive and well. Parallel universe is the only plausible explanation that avoids paradoxes.'
See: Wikipedia>Grandfather paradox>Parallel universes |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Flame6264
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3379 |
|
| |
|