Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:27 AM |
PM me if this is good enough.
The war starts with us raiding each other's bases. Defenses do not count. Each raid victory is one win. One victory per server.
At 20 total wins (both sides combined), there will be a FB. The side with more wins chooses weapons used and uses their warzone.
The FB will be fought three times. Best two out of three, win the war. If you have more wins, you also get more lives, based on the difference.
Start with 10 lives. If you have 5 more wins that enemy, you have 15 lives. Etc.
TAR's FB team is 5 Aetherians, 3 subs. Good enough? What to change?
If they ever even accept a FB. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
hillbilly
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Apr 2007 |
| Total Posts: 1508 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:27 AM |
| CL never declared war on SL. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:28 AM |
Do you have a base?
Complexykins |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:30 AM |
| So your saying if we go 20-0 on you guys we have to fight you at least two more times in a FB that just sounds dumb... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
thea96
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 37634 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:31 AM |
>CL never declared war on SL.
wat |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ncusa17
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7049 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:34 AM |
| CL doesn't have a base yet. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:44 AM |
I think the final battle should only multiply the raid wins by 1.3 of the victorious team. Seriously, you're not going to win a FB against CL, so I think this would make it a bit fairer |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:46 AM |
Yeah no, here's better war terms.
First to 25 wins Defense wins don't count. Admin abuse in a server counts as a win for either side. Exploited servers do not count. If the war stays as a stalemate (20-20) or gets inactive will result in a FB. If the war does get inactive when CL has 23 wins and the other side has 0 then an advantage will be given to the winning side.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:48 AM |
why do you need 3 FB
It's called a Final Battle for a reason. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:50 AM |
3 Final battles? Are you stupid? 1 final battle. 'FINAL' Battle, not final battle three more times.
Better terms: How about SL and CL raid you untill you give up, then we'll FB you.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 09:50 AM |
The terms are for SL and CL as they are at war with TAR. It is not with them against each other.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 10:57 AM |
-War to 20 wins
-No defensive wins
-If the war is down to a five win difference, a final battle will be held
-5v5 with however many subs wanted
-The side with more wins in the case of a battle will have one extra life for every raid win they have more than the enemy
-TAR base must have guns in it
-No one touch terminals
-Some flaming permitted, no swearing and no things like real life threats but making fun of peoples' group is fine |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Allocated
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 26321 |
|
| |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:19 AM |
| Everything seems fine except for the extra health thing in the FB. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:20 AM |
>except for the extra health thing in the FB.
uh what |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:22 AM |
better war terms:
raid for months until surrender is achieved
no rules |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:35 AM |
@Altair
If you have 5 more wins that enemy, you have 15 lives. Etc. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:44 AM |
| it's because of having more raid wins, why would you not be rewarded for getting more wins? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:48 AM |
I guess that's true, does that usually work now a days? Thing is they don't have a fort ._.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:50 AM |
>FB will be fought three times >three times
makes_absolute_sense.pdf
>20 wins >20
10 is the max.
As far as SL is concerned this is merely a "game war", simply for extra practice. We're always open for a challenge.
-General Umb -Hail SL! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ShadowSTR
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 24465 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 11:52 AM |
| IT should be first to surrender, no fb crap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 18 May 2013 12:46 PM |
Okay, Sl and CL each have different terms. This was made generally. We will have FB with CL.
TAR base will have guns. FB will be guns only. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|