DatFuta
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 635 |
|
|
| 12 May 2013 11:01 PM |
Instead of making primarily browser based, Roblox could create a downloadable client that would enhance social features and add features like in game parties, in game chat to people outside of the game etc. Generally a better presented Roblox that isn't browser based with enhanced social capabilities.
I know this is fairly vague so, maybe add some ideas. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DatFuta
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 635 |
|
| |
|
DatFuta
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 635 |
|
|
| 12 May 2013 11:15 PM |
| bump, I think people should see this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2013 11:18 PM |
| That's an awesome idea. Roblox needs Steam like design, and microphone abilities. Great idea sir. Five stars. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DatFuta
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 635 |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 May 2013 12:40 AM |
No support. Copyright issues, nuff' said.
-LJ- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Desperian
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3371 |
|
|
| 13 May 2013 01:07 AM |
No support.
ROBLOX doesn't need a client alike what you're describing. Basically it just sounds like you want them to create their own browser, which is what STEAM technically is when you remove the 'My Library' section. A website is just fine, it holds what we need and doesn't require use to download more than what's needed, and I personally don't want to have to use my normal browser, STEAM and this Ro-Client thing. You'd also likely be restricted with the amount of pages you could have open on the client, so again, no. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 May 2013 01:09 AM |
| I don't really have an opinion on this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
chaocrazy
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 150 |
|
|
| 13 May 2013 03:25 AM |
Support. The website's chat latency is terrible, and it's easy to miss notifications when you're invited to a party or when someone starts chatting with you. If there were a whole new window for it, I'd suppose it would help with a lot of issues. I don't care for voice chat support, because this is Roblox. Not Steam or Xbox Live. Reasons why are pretty self-explanatory. They had a Roblox browser at one point, back around when I joined, or maybe in 2009 too. It changed nothing, but I just don't think they did it right. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 May 2013 04:10 AM |
| A steam client isn't really needed. If they make a Steam-like overlay that'd be good enough, so you could chat with people privately, which is good for games such as Deadzone or Apocalypse Rising - Everything else though(such as voice chat), already able to be done with Steam itself. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Treticle
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2016 |
|
|
| 13 May 2013 10:01 AM |
It seems weird basing an idea on another copyrighted application... But hey its a good idea.
Support. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DatFuta
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 635 |
|
|
| 13 May 2013 04:34 PM |
| When I say steam like client, I mean that roblox should have a client with more social capabilities rather than a socially primitive browser based system. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 May 2013 05:18 PM |
No Support. This is just more money, and more time away from important updates for Roblox. I prefer a browser based site since it requires no download, and I don't have to worry about client crashes or bugs or anything like that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|