generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
Home Search
 

Evidence of WIJ Twisting Rules (JC War)

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
PLOOBER33 is not online. PLOOBER33
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Total Posts: 7513
11 Apr 2013 09:02 PM
@the WIJ guy, I think it is at least fair to allow the actual date originally agreed upon to happen instead of moving the date up while PSP is on vacation

I also wonder why WIJ was in such a hurry? Could their clan have kept up its raiding habits for 9 more days or not?
Report Abuse
PLOOBER33 is not online. PLOOBER33
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Total Posts: 7513
11 Apr 2013 09:04 PM
If John says he gave that power to his HR's I would agree with you. I cannot operate under assumptions that we have no proof of however, only what I can see made public.
Report Abuse
benblue is not online. benblue
Joined: 08 May 2009
Total Posts: 1916
11 Apr 2013 09:05 PM
"Targeted exploits and admin abusing will not be tolerated by either side."

WIJ did not declare an unconditional victory due to raid wins - they simply stated the raid wins to show their clear superiority over JC. WIJ declared a conditional victory on account of admin abuse and exploring that was not properly responded to in a expedient manner by JC.
Report Abuse
PLOOBER33 is not online. PLOOBER33
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Total Posts: 7513
11 Apr 2013 09:05 PM
What you are saying, is more like

If someones kid hits someone elses kid, you are totally good as the parent of the victim to beat the living crap out of the other kid if his parents are away at work.
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:06 PM
'SS claims to be the official fella, but what about JC? Maybe John gave some power to the JC HRs?

If not, then the JC HRs were idiots to make such decisions.'


I think what he means is that officially whoever owns the group, can make the final decision. Devolving powers should in no way be a disadvantage and arguing it as a case is stupid. You really think anywhere it has been officially stated that in his absence they are able to make the decision on whether or not a final battle can be done tomorrow, prior to an original date being set upon. Highly doubt such terms have been set anyway. If you are arguing that and can prove it, so be it, but I doubt the proof.


As for the JC HRs, the decisions idiotic or not, as SS are 'not official'.
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:08 PM
'WIJ declared a conditional victory on account of admin abuse and exploring that was not properly responded to in a expedient manner by JC.'

It was already agreed upon, this failure to properly respond to admin abuse would result in the war being ceased. No conditional victory.
Report Abuse
Rovert10 is not online. Rovert10
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Total Posts: 2465
11 Apr 2013 09:08 PM
However cashpop. pspjohn1 immediately rebuted the decision and made it null and void for JC.

The controversy here is whether or not WIJ was right to just take home the unconditional victory.

If it were me, I would just wait and redo the battle. Since we have nothing to lose anyways. But I am not SS nor Owen nor am I part of HICOM.

However the community has just accepted our declaration of victory. So if we're going by that then why bother?

Controversial for certain but I am uncertain if it is worth the attention it is recieving right now.
Report Abuse
PLOOBER33 is not online. PLOOBER33
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Total Posts: 7513
11 Apr 2013 09:09 PM
I don't see the community as accepting the victory. I see WIJ accepting the victory.
Report Abuse
bioniclehero is not online. bioniclehero
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Total Posts: 2185
11 Apr 2013 09:10 PM
If JC can't make any decisions without pspjohn and he is on vacation, then why didn't they postpone the war?

Quit speaking for JC when neither of you are a part of them.
Report Abuse
nahom007 is not online. nahom007
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 18274
11 Apr 2013 09:11 PM
"I don't see the community as accepting the victory. I see WIJ accepting the victory."

Then I don't see you and Celestus arguing on this thread to be productive.

I see JC as the ones to make their own arguments with first-hand talks with other WIJ HRs.
Report Abuse
cashpop is not online. cashpop
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Total Posts: 2984
11 Apr 2013 09:11 PM
You don't see the community accepting?

Look at the forums from both of WIJ and JC.

You can see the hate and love.


Honestly all this arguing is pointless. We can go on and on, but there is no winner in this.


I just want the FB to end all this.

And yes this is signaling I am done for now.
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:12 PM
'If JC can't make any decisions without pspjohn and he is on vacation, then why didn't they postpone the war?

Quit speaking for JC when neither of you are a part of them.'

Because they didn't have to postpone it, should the original rules have been kept to by WIJ the battle would have been on the 20th and he would have got back for vacation.

Also, we have all right to speak for anyone who we choose to.
Report Abuse
nahom007 is not online. nahom007
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 18274
11 Apr 2013 09:14 PM
"Also, we have all right to speak for anyone who we choose to."

So in turn the community has the right to agree that WIJ has won the war.

And I'm just comparing two different situations here, just as how you did with SS claiming Owen doesn't lead WIJ and Pspjohn calling off something his HRs called.

So please stop trying to make a big fuss on C&G to prove something.
Report Abuse
bioniclehero is not online. bioniclehero
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Total Posts: 2185
11 Apr 2013 09:15 PM
No, you dont.

You don't have any right to speak for someone at all unless they let you.

Why isn't JC here? Let them argue.



Oh wait.

They forfeited.
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:15 PM
@Cash

That is generally WIJ members posting their support, not those neutral to both.


Might I also point out, we are not speaking on behalf of JC, we are pointing out the rules WIJ has broke, as such moves should be highlighted in the possible event of war in future.

Report Abuse
PLOOBER33 is not online. PLOOBER33
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Total Posts: 7513
11 Apr 2013 09:15 PM
You may want to actually read that thread I put on the first page of this.
Report Abuse
Rovert10 is not online. Rovert10
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Total Posts: 2465
11 Apr 2013 09:16 PM
@bionicle and nahom

They still retain their right to state their arguements and opinions.
Whether you like it or not, they can still do it.

If it annoys you to this extent then don't bother to argue and ignore them. Let the situation handle itself.

Discourse is your only way to find solid answers regardless of who it is you're having it with.
Report Abuse
furt7483 is not online. furt7483
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Total Posts: 2766
11 Apr 2013 09:16 PM
Very true.
Report Abuse
nahom007 is not online. nahom007
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 18274
11 Apr 2013 09:16 PM
@Rovert

No I'm just enjoying myself as to how they're getting in over their heads over something that has already happened.

Report Abuse
Rovert10 is not online. Rovert10
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Total Posts: 2465
11 Apr 2013 09:18 PM
@nahom007

Okay... then why bother to post? Just to fan the flames?
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:21 PM
Anyway, having read those who posted in this thread.

Out of the 5 non-WIJ who posted. 4 posted comments supporting my evidence, one argued against it.
Report Abuse
cashpop is not online. cashpop
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Total Posts: 2984
11 Apr 2013 09:21 PM
Here is what you argue, celestus, like you said, you go by the loophole that the war will cease if there are AA's by either side and so WIJ cannot declare a victory because it did not state that in the original contract,

What I am saying is that it isn't set in stone. Their discussions could have changed up the rules. The JC HRs may or may not have the power to talk to SS and owen to make such decisions, but who stopped them? John is off at vacation at this time. Such a time really. So this is very bad play on the hierarchy of JC.

What;s the bottom line of this?

We can only argue more and more.

Honestly, I blame owen for not letting the FB happen at the right time. This we both can agree on.

I just want the FB.
Report Abuse
bioniclehero is not online. bioniclehero
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Total Posts: 2185
11 Apr 2013 09:27 PM
Heck, I argued for the FB to be moved to Saturday instead on the ST wall, because it was going to fast.

I wanted a FB, but JC backed out.

JC backed out.

JC lost. By backing out they accepted defeat.
Report Abuse
nahom007 is not online. nahom007
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 18274
11 Apr 2013 09:29 PM
Seems like STs are going to have to force them to an FB
Report Abuse
Celestus is not online. Celestus
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 14873
11 Apr 2013 09:34 PM
Devolving powers should in no way be a disadvantage and arguing it as a case is wrong. You really think anywhere it has been officially stated that in his absence they are able to make the decision on whether or not a final battle can be done tomorrow, prior to an original date being set upon. Highly doubt such terms have been set anyway. If you are arguing that and can prove it, so be it, but I doubt the proof. From what I have heard, pspjohn refused to go ahead with the final battle anyway at that given date, being the final decision maker that is his choice.

Yes owen should have gone with the agreed final battle date. Backing out of one which was set the day before by one group doesn't account to a defeat.
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 4 of 5Go to page: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 Prev Next
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image