Merely
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17266 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:22 PM |
| #1 is the most common serial number for a Limited unique item. Think about it, every item has a #1. The number becomes more rare as it increases. #12000 is really rare because only a handful of items have that many in stock. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Salinas23
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 37142 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:22 PM |
Is there any?
I thought Boo Visor was the limited with the most copies (10k)
Its liek zOMG H@X!!1 DB = 3B! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
forever21
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3338 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
DullMind
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 35524 |
|
| |
|
masterkev
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3164 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:23 PM |
So #1 is more common than #2 or #3?
Flood check got me again... AFK |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Salinas23
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 37142 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:23 PM |
@Help
o true
Liek 12k sumthing ryt?
I was original owner of #10k something
Its liek zOMG H@X!!1 DB = 3B! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
vobot41
|
  |
| Joined: 09 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 6888 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:24 PM |
| Um, okay. I'll go with that... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mcbob431
|
  |
| Joined: 26 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 6673 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:24 PM |
| Yes, but #1 is more desirable. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Merely
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17266 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:24 PM |
>So #1 is more common than #2 or #3?
Yes, because the tablets all have #1 but not #2 or #3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Seranok
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 11083 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:25 PM |
| ya #1 has aesthetic value which makes it more valuable even though its the most common serial number |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
3ATPIE
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2950 |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:25 PM |
Well, this is true........ O_o
But, people like numbers that have special meaning to them, no matter how common. But I never thought of it this way ;o. Nice. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sitar
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 22965 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:26 PM |
how about another blow to your mind
PVGs and NVGs were released exactly 5 years apart from eachother |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
forever21
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3338 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:28 PM |
@sitar
false, pvg was 12/19/2012 nvg 12/21/2007 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mcbob431
|
  |
| Joined: 26 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 6673 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:30 PM |
| #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8+ All are the same rarity, as MOST of the time there is no more than 2500, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sitar
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 22965 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 11:31 PM |
they were released on the same day
not created but released |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
forever21
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3338 |
|
| |
|