|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:46 PM |
You are both acting like immature brats.
Civil, I respected your group greatly until I witnessed your attitudes in game and on the forums. I do not blame TCR for getting frustrated with your attitudes.
However, the group banning was completely unnecessary. Rodger should place stricter rules regarding flame on his base, as opposed to group banning Civil and withdrawing. If Civil is truly a group deserving of their reputation, and willing to fight this war and finish it fair and square, they can follow TCR's rules, and vice versa.
If TCR wants continued support from the Coalition of Steel, they should act as though they deserve it.
Civil should act like a respectable group, and not a band of immature brats. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
AlexR1212
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14288 |
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:48 PM |
| You should've thought twice when you allowed TCR into CoS. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:49 PM |
"Civil, I respected your group greatly until I witnessed your attitudes in game and on the forums. I do not blame TCR for getting frustrated with your attitudes."
Civil's determined attitude has always been there. It would increase self esteem in Civilen, but then it'd lower morale and start a flame war with opponents. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:50 PM |
| UAF and several other CoS members wanted to allow TCR into the Coalition. As it is a coalition, I listened to the majority and allowed them in. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:51 PM |
They're worse than 022.
~Düx~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:52 PM |
There's a difference between having a determined attitude, and just being a complete brat.
There is a very defined line, and Civil insists on consistently crossing it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dinizterz
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4193 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:53 PM |
| I'm finding this out just recently that Civil is on the enemy list of CoS yet you don't raid? I'm pushing the wall back on you in this situation. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:53 PM |
I would honestly deal with them if they were just annoying, instead they choose to insult my members and flame.
TCR voted to remove them; I followed the groups decision.
~Düx~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
AlexR1212
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14288 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:54 PM |
| Bball, if we know how Civil is, why would we want to deal with them? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ToberDam
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11054 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:56 PM |
| @Bballer: You have no room to talk considering x-101st warred and surrendered to TCR on the same day. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:57 PM |
| @Tober, warring with TCR was a mistake ON MY FIRST DAY GETTING X-101ST. OF COURSE I HAVE TO MAKE CHANGES, AND REFORMS DON'T I? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 06:59 PM |
"I'm finding this out just recently that Civil is on the enemy list of CoS yet you don't raid? I'm pushing the wall back on you in this situation."
CoS is here to assist TCR in it's fight against Civil. It is my duty as the placeholder to ensure the equilibrium of the forces within CoS. I noticed that this conflict between TCR and Civil has escalated to a very pathetic stance, both sides acting foolish, as I had stated in this post originally.
TGI has been assisting TCR consistently with defenses. The rhetoric presented by Civil disgusts me, as does the response from TCR.
TGI is not officially at war with Civil, neither are any other groups in the Coalition. The fact that Civil is on the list of enemies in the CoS is to allow a basic understanding of the global situation regarding the status of groups in the Coalition of steel, and whether or not assistance is needed from any other CoS member states.
For example, TGI is at war with VS, but we do not want CoS assistance due to alliance complications.
I am pushing the wall on both CoS and Civil here. Both TCR and Civil must step up their game. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ToberDam
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11054 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:00 PM |
| Did I poke at a soft spot? You've gotten demoted for raiding TCR/CoS, You've gotten x-101st shamed in a one day defeat. There is no excuse for a mistake when you constantly fail against us. Get out of here. You have absolutely no room to talk. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Strieken
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3058 |
|
| |
|
Dinizterz
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4193 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:02 PM |
You're talking of a behavioral problem please know that behavioral problems when minor as this are as pathetic as you find em to be since behavior doesn't win wars.
And I've only seen you defend, never raid. Not raid USF nor Civil. Which is a problem in your logic. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:04 PM |
| I raided TCR for practice, TGI raided Franneh for practice? Did we declare war on you? Also, we demolished TCR in our first war against them, and that was when they didn't rely on the Coalition for All assistance against us. I was demoted because X-101st can't POSSIBLY hope to stand against a whole coalition. "One day defeat" Rodger made me admit defeat because i realized at the time that we needed reforms and also, Rodger told me to hide the war score on my admit of defeat. the raid score was X-101st: 2 TCR:1 That 1 raid win was won by CoS. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Eraticus
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12615 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:04 PM |
| Not our fault for your crappy team scripts, Dinizterz. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lejam7890
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3594 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:05 PM |
"crappy team scripts"
Try something new sometimes bro. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:05 PM |
| No, but Civil's behavior was the spark that initiated the reaction on TCR's part. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:06 PM |
@Eraticus
Crappy team scripts?
It's to keep the game even, so neither teams can get all pissy for having unbalanced sides.
Clearly, one side is getting mad about it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Eraticus
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12615 |
|
|
| 03 Apr 2013 07:07 PM |
| Was that old, Lejam? I haven't seen it on the forums. I'm too busy doing things in real life. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|