Seiren
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Mar 2013 |
| Total Posts: 3286 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 12:55 PM |
| Should be allowed to have a abortlon |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
TKU4ever
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 435 |
|
| |
|
phoniex
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 34985 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 12:56 PM |
| Agreed, but this isn't the place to discuss a subject like this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TKU4ever
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 435 |
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:00 PM |
@phon Oh, so you're a fan of killing babies? How wonderful a person you must be. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
phoniex
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 34985 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:02 PM |
@imbored
No, but I don't think people who aren't ready to take care of a baby should have a choice. It's a free country after all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:05 PM |
@phon You know, there IS such a thing as an adoption center so you don't have to kill an innocent little thing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
phoniex
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 34985 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:06 PM |
| But the thing wasn't even born yet. Plus, we simply don't have enough resources on this planet to support such a large population. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:07 PM |
@imbored The baby isn't born yet. It's just a cell. You can kill a cell you Christian scrub.
I mean Venusaur...with a question mark |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:09 PM |
| @phon: Maybe not born, but alive. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:12 PM |
Ab0rti0n is not killing a baby, it is killing a f3tu5--a single celled organism with no thoughts or feelings. It is a Christian fatalist belief that killing the f3tu5 is equivalent to killing what it will grow to be. This is not true. Killing a f3tu5 is equivalent to killing a germ.
ElectricBlaze • Programmer • Wiki Writer | http://wiki.roblox.com/index.php/User:ElectricBlaze |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PerryComo
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3240 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:12 PM |
| I agree, so long as the baby hasn't developed a brain yet. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
XC62
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5361 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2013 01:16 PM |
I agree on ALL situations.
The mother is growing the child into a human being. The mother’s body will produce this human being when the gestation period is complete. The mother is responsible for these steps and is directly affected by them. It is always the mother’s choice what she does with her body, so as long as the baby is physiologically dependent on the mother – the baby’s existence is at the mother’s discretion.
Not the father’s, society’s or the government’s discretion.
The baby is not a human being with rights to me until it is no longer physically dependent on the mother. That includes the physical dependence of the mother allowing her body to be surgically altered to remove the baby. How can a free human being be physically dependent on another - and supposing they were – who’s rights would supersede and by what criteria do we determine that?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|