|
| 15 Mar 2013 05:22 PM |
(These are the most played on the radio for this week)
1. Tempest-Deftones 2. Where Did The Angels Go-Papa Roach 3. Same Old Trip-Chevelle 4. I Will Not Bow-Breaking Benjamin 5. Bones-Young Guns
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 05:24 PM |
| Because your favorite tunes are the top tunes, right? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 05:34 PM |
| God, I am so tired of opinion fact statements |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 06:15 PM |
| @John, you idiot. These were played the most in the past week on a rock radio station. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Jared343
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9030 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 06:54 PM |
| Uh. The top five played songs on a certain local radio station don't necessarily make them the top five, lol. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 06:57 PM |
@Jared, I know. I just wanted people to VIEW the thread. If I said "Top 5 rock songs played on the radio this week" no one would of clicked on it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jared343
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9030 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 06:57 PM |
| Nah, I'm sure people would have. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:06 PM |
| It's funny because this thread would have still sucked even if it wasn't derailed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:27 PM |
@OP
You mentioned Breaking Benjamin. I love you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:30 PM |
| Awesome's opinion is a fact. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:32 PM |
| It isn't a fact, never said it was, I said the songs are bad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:33 PM |
>implying that I was being sarcastic
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:34 PM |
| No implies John, none at all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:38 PM |
| I don't want to see any other implications from you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:50 PM |
| >implying that I was implying you were implying, which means you just implied, which means I have to lay down the law |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:52 PM |
| >implying that I won't come down and conflagrate you like a three-shade stalker if you don't stop implying that I am implying |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:54 PM |
| >implying my implication was directed to your implication implying my implication |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
johnb
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 24998 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 08:54 PM |
| >still implying, regardless of what you were implying |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|