zoomypie2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8050 |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:45 PM |
To save one child who will invent a new way of feeding the entire planet, considering the 88% chance of death doesn't occur to him because of his terminal illness.
Would you terminate your whole bloodline to save an important child who will almost certainly die anyway?
Choose.
~Dead Masters scythe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:46 PM |
| I don't have to answer this! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
hidogs
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 5285 |
|
| |
|
XC62
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5361 |
|
| |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:48 PM |
| no because he would probably be assassinated by some rebel anyway |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zoomypie2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8050 |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:48 PM |
I agree, it's totally illogical as we will eventually find another way to feed the planet, millions may die of starvation till then but who cares?
~Dead Masters scythe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zoomypie2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8050 |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:49 PM |
So OT, risk the millions of people in the future generation or eliminate your bloodline?
Choose.
~Dead Masters scythe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:49 PM |
| no because i don't want to feed the planet |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TradeSwag
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2346 |
|
| |
|
XC62
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5361 |
|
| |
|
zoomypie2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8050 |
|
|
| 09 Mar 2013 02:56 PM |
@XC
You do when it's neccecary.
You americans DID nuke Japan twice after all.. (Not an insult)
~Dead Masters scythe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
XC62
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5361 |
|
| |
|