|
| 28 Feb 2013 06:34 PM |
PSTF looks better ...
i r teh pwnz0r! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
vobot41
|
  |
| Joined: 09 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 6888 |
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 06:34 PM |
No. But it's getting there.
PSTF owners are extremely biased, making the value lower.
RSTF owners are biased too, but not as biased. If anything, PSTF is lowering. RSTF isn't really raising. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Swugger
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3215 |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 06:34 PM |
| i tink u meant rstf looks bettr |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
dwd1106
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 15222 |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 06:35 PM |
| @Hamster I don't care about looks, but as far as value goes the RSTF has a ways to go. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
tnt91
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 43390 |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 06:36 PM |
| .. what do you think ? PSTF is still > RSTF, obviously |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|