Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:47 PM |
There should be more than one battle.
Which go like this:
One clan picks its favoured warzone, e.g. WIJ pitgrounds.
Another clan picks its favoured warzone, e.g. VAK warzone.
They then battle at pitgrounds with the expectancy that WIJ will win then they battle at VAK warzone with the expectancy that VAK will win, this process is repeated until one clan has had a two win streak at both maps. Similar to a penalty process in football or soccer as Americans call it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
hydrodash
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9759 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
Smartlestus.
~Trust no one. Question everything.~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:51 PM |
Well it's pretty simple, it just removes the home ground advantage.
Of course both warzones would have to be symmetrical in design with the same weapons given to each team.
There could also be an independent observer to watch the map for foul play, by foul play I mean some unfair health or gun damage advantage.
I know people would argue, well just uncopylock the map, problem with that is you can hide such advantages in hidden services. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WII3579
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 439 |
|
| |
|
Skyman772
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9305 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:57 PM |
*golf clap*
- RAT Supervisor and Second Degree Immortal, Skyman772 - |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fernak
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18810 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:58 PM |
final battles should be the art of mahjong yes MAHJONG! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Fyritas
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2658 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 03:23 PM |
Or they have 3 maps so one clan always win
ponyswagyolo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ZaxXD
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 792 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
1Ali1
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1070 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
gk27sigma
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3595 |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:00 PM |
Final Battle.' Final Battles. different
"Lions, Tigers and Bears, but I ain't scared 'cause they Vegan" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:02 PM |
| That's a great idea. I support it. Even though I really don't like the concept of Final Battles in the first place. Still great idea! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:05 PM |
| Sounds good. I would rather have it like 1 for each clan then a neutral clan leader would chose a different one then they would fight there. Best 2 of 3 wins. That way, it would show who is the best at adapting and using their strengths. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mick60
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 2069 |
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:07 PM |
Or you could do it so whoever has the most raid wins gets the home advantage during the Final Battle.
-Trinity Republic Armed Forces Chief Supreme General- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Fil2959
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3415 |
|
| |
|
halomeny
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4273 |
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:10 PM |
This would cause disaster in some clans; confusion in others.
Firstly, clans would still disagree on who 'won' wether the base was 'fair' and wether the guns 'didn't lag'
Clans like WIJ, I have seen this before, give themselves more advanced and better guns, where as the opposing team gets nothing.
It would just be simpler if one person made a decent final battle place and ALL FB's were there, under supervision of a neutral clan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 12:13 PM |
Very nice idea.
MinatōThéHokagê |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 12:53 PM |
| Bumping this as it is relevant to the WIJvVAK friendly battle proposal. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1Ali1
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1070 |
|
| |
|