|
| 04 Feb 2013 07:26 PM |
Liberalism means to have bigger government, more spending, more services provided by the Government, etc.
The problem with Liberalism is that there isn't infinite money, you have a budget and so much money that you have. Spending too much money on services results in debt. Debt is what you owe to someone else. Lets say you are in a $! million dollar debt due to too much spending. Liberalism fails to explain how they can cut spending and get rid of debt, but they are very excellent on explaining how to extend social services and increasing spending.
Lets take ROBLOX for an example. If ROBLOX spends more money then they can, they can be in debt so bad, it will cause them to bankrupt. The reason why RoBLOX is sucessful because they manage their spending so they will not go in debt. The problem is if they do too many upgrades, it can put the ROBLOX Corporation in debt because they may not afford the upgrades, but do them anyways.
So, Liberalism is not great to society because there is NOT infinete money. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 04 Feb 2013 07:37 PM |
I prefer Conservative.
[-[★-]Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Feb 2013 07:39 PM |
| @twinkie Exactly. I prefer Conservatism because they understand that we don't have infinete money. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Feb 2013 07:41 PM |
And they understand that less government produces more liberties.
[-[★-]Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 04 Feb 2013 07:47 PM |
| You don't give more money to a government that's $16 trillion in debt. That's how it happened in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Corridan
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7344 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 07:05 PM |
| how are they supposed to pay off that debt with no money? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 07:38 PM |
| then what exactly the heck were Ronald Reagan and Dubya doing all those years they kept spending more money than we could afford? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RagEgnite
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3294 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 08:33 PM |
*Reads first line* ...
*Facedesk* |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RagEgnite
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3294 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 08:34 PM |
| I think you meant to say "Socialism," not "Liberalism." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Varese
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1685 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:09 PM |
problem:money solution:eliminate money |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:18 PM |
I think you meant to say "Socialism," not "Liberalism." ------------------------------------------------------------------ When will you realize that socialists are liberals? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Corridan
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7344 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:19 PM |
| can someone answer my question please |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Varese
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1685 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:27 PM |
"When will you realize that socialists are liberals?"
ya cuz liberals believe in freedomofspeechreligionandexpressionandsuch |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:37 PM |
| Jimmie, is that you? I thought you quit! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Varese
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1685 |
|
| |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2013 09:47 PM |
| Thank God, Jimmie. I thought I lost you forever because you abandoned Twitter and ROBLOX. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 07 Feb 2013 10:20 AM |
'Liberalism means to have bigger government'
Wrong, Liberals want limited Government, in other words a smaller Government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 07 Feb 2013 10:25 AM |
And yes you mean Socialism not Liberalism. Socialism and Liberalism are too different things. Typically Liberalism is an ideology based upon social rather than economic goals, meaning you could be either a Conservative Liberal or a Socialist Liberal.
A two paragraph explanation also doesn't really give a legitimate explanation as to why Liberalism fails, you haven't actually explained anything in depth, just normative statements. This would imply your source of information is just opinionated rather than factual, perhaps implying you have heard it from somebody else without actually properly understanding the content behind any of it. I suggest you learn how to structure and form an argument before yelling things like "Liberals spend money they don't have" or "They don't explain how to cut back". You clearly don't understand Keynesian policy, you don't cut back you boost aggregate demand by spending, which as a result creates economic growth, employment and so on and so forth. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|