|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:40 PM |
USA.
Several tact nukes could level the UK and it's channel. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Moscovite
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1025 |
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:40 PM |
| You play too many Violent games mate. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:41 PM |
"mate"
Uh, don't ausies only say that? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:41 PM |
| The United States does have the advantage, based on military strength, numbers, and probably equipment, BUT I do believe the UK has a better economy, which may affect the outcome. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
gup10
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6819 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Moscovite
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1025 |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:44 PM |
| Why would UK and US even go to war? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:44 PM |
| How do I play to many games? It's true. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:45 PM |
well
most of europe would declare war on the united states if they attacked britain directly
because britain is one of the few nations keeping the eurozone alive
russia would most likely aid europe
the middle east would use this time to take out israel
and so on |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:46 PM |
"Mutually assured Destruction"
The UK have enough water based nuclear missiles to level the majority of your city's, and by firing first you would declare war on the entirety of the world, along with your own populace.
Also, I think the UK have a anti-ballistic missile program.
A non-nuclear war would be a close call, but thanks to English Interests in america, I think they would win, because America obviously declared war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:46 PM |
china would side with the US
Russia might as well |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:48 PM |
"tactical nukes"
you sir are a bloody idiot Have you never even heard of the Trident Programme? Fairly famous, y'know. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Moscovite
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1025 |
|
| |
|
jamkid12
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17460 |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:48 PM |
"china would side with the US"
cause there isn't a whole bunch of european countries near to it
gnius!1 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Moscovite
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1025 |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
| Russia would back UK and China would remain neutral. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
The UKs
Cyber-warfare > America Navy > America Air-force > America Satellite program > America (We make your satellites ) Elite forces, Intelligence forces > America
Americas Army, erm Horde > The UKs
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
@Dun
Are you implying we would just launch nuclear missiles out of the blue?
We could obviously disable the ballistic defense. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
| If this was back in 1800, Britain. Now, USA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Outlaw001
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 35333 |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
What Artia said and that Canada is technically the son of Europe and England.
-One does NOT simply become an Outlaw while saying 'DID SOMEBODY SAY 'OUTLAW'' |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:49 PM |
Both sides have nuclear weapons suggesting a nuclear war most likely causing the world to be mostly destroyed.
C&G penguin/froguin Bazinga! Steam: jamiethedevi1 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Moscovite
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1025 |
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:50 PM |
| Too many Chinese products getting sold to the US for China to back Europe. It would destroy their economy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Feb 2013 02:50 PM |
@Jam
Or, because China provided aid to the US economy.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|