|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:18 PM |
| This is fact and anyone who believes otherwise is uneducated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
KoolKhara
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 73 |
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:19 PM |
The world is 4.6 BYA
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN BIOIRON? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:20 PM |
| I think he means Earth. Not the universe. And he should know it has been around for much longer then 6000 years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:22 PM |
| No, A LOT longer then 6000 years. Like over 9000 years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:24 PM |
| Yeah I know, but the 6000 year figure is the one invoked by idiots. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:25 PM |
| No no no. I think those people mean that Human civilization started in the year 6000 BCE. 6000 or 4000. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:26 PM |
No, they think the world was formed at the time.
Americans are wonderful. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Iskrat
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 6103 |
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:26 PM |
| The world has existed for millions of years.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Marvin808
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3844 |
|
| |
|
Marvin808
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3844 |
|
| |
|
Iskrat
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 6103 |
|
| |
|
Robonix
|
  |
| Joined: 05 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 351 |
|
|
| 18 Jan 2013 08:31 PM |
| 4.6 Billion years ago chunks of colliding rock became our Earth. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:00 PM |
| anyone with an education beyond 200bc knew the world was round |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:19 PM |
| The world existed for a longer time, for billion years... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:35 PM |
| i wasn't saying the earth was made in 200 bc you prat.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cpt5
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1724 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:44 PM |
| The Earth has been around for about 10000 years no less. I don't believe that it is millions of years old because those facts came around because of carbon dating. Carbon dating has failed multiple times and anyone who knows about the stories of carbon dating failures doesn't believe that million-billion year old stuff. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:52 PM |
jokes on you idiot. Carbon dating isn't used to tell the date of rocks its used to date remains of animals and plants
uranium-lead isotope dating is the one used to date the Earth. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cpt5
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1724 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:56 PM |
And animals and plants can date the area they lived in.
Is it necessary for you to include an insult in all your posts? If you want to ignorant at least don't make yourself look more dumb than you already are. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cpt5
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1724 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:57 PM |
| Oh and I guess scientists are always correct because their Big Bang Theory and Evolution Theory are totally concrete. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
goonie78
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1432 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 01:59 PM |
| This forum post makes no sense. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
goonie78
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1432 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 02:00 PM |
| The earth is 2014 years old not 6000. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cpt5
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1724 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 02:01 PM |
No it isn't. You forgot to add the B.C. years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2014 02:13 PM |
evolution is
hear is what you don't understand
science doesn't just come up with this stuff, scientists look at all the available data and evidence and then build an explanation for it that incorporates the data and evidence. If more evidence comes to light scientist amend the explanation to fit the new evidence and if it does not fit they go back to square one and try to come up with a better theory to explain it. Evolution and the big bang take into account all the evidence that is currently available and they give good robust explanations of why things are as they are.
I much prefer a method that admits its own fallibility and strives to better explain things when something challenges the status quo rather than pin everything on a immortal sky wizard with a chip on his shoulder and ignore anything that indicates otherwise.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|