|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:38 PM |
| It would take a acouple centuries to undo the government's work, but eventually it'd be the best type of territory. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VoidHack
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 15753 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:39 PM |
"Territory"
You spelled government wrong. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:40 PM |
@voidhack
Nope. Anarchy is not a form of government because it is no government. The "country" would tern into a "territory" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:40 PM |
As it stands, people's morals are not better, and thus anarchy is a terrible form of "government."
-God Bless- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:41 PM |
| I do see how you might've been confused though... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VoidHack
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 15753 |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:42 PM |
@Noober
It's not a form of government. It's really the only political philosophy that is truly free. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:43 PM |
@voidhack
I don't see where "moron" could replace any of the words I've used in these sentences. Except for the times I've put "@" in front of your name. But I doubt you're implying that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:44 PM |
| Everything would work, given perfect morals. Since we don't have that, we have government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
BroFilly
|
  |
| Joined: 10 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1541 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:45 PM |
| morals are developed through social interaction |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:46 PM |
@play
It wouldn't even take perfect morals. Government nowadays is really just an excuse for argumentative people to obtain money fast. There are very few honest polititians. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 07:55 PM |
@Davidxyloto: Please note the parentheses around the term government in my initial post. This was to indicate my understanding that a lack of government is not necessarily government. Moreover, all you pointed out was a useless facet of semantics, and in no way addressed my concerns. I would appreciate it if you would reevaluate your post. Unless, of course, you are stating a hypothetical statement (as one might initially gather from the title of this thread), and thus going into the realm of philisophy. In that case, I agree with you. If people were perfectly moral, there would be no need for government. (Excluding, of course, the need to accomplish larger organized projects, such as space exploration.)
-God Bless- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 08:02 PM |
@noober
Anarchy itself is a political philosophy; it's in the definition. I agree with your statements about the hypothetical moralistic world, but I don't agree that it is necessary for every important feat to be government organized. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Keech
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1564 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 08:04 PM |
@play
It wouldn't even take perfect morals. Government nowadays is really just an excuse for argumentative people to obtain money fast. There are very few honest polititians. Yes it would. People would hurt each other for supplies, personal gain, maybe even psychopathic fun. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 08:05 PM |
@play
Not all morals are social, some are personal. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|