|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:42 PM |
Let z, c, and g represent clans.
z>c c>g
Now, say that g defeats z, and proves g>z.
We then have a contradiction, for if g>z and c>g, then z cannot be greater than c. Thus this theory will have been proved false.
Now, if it turns out z>g (as one would expect from the function), then z>c>g.
UAF and RAT are clans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:56 PM |
| But math is the language of nature. :( |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dandog133
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1430 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:57 PM |
now I hate math even more.
-=[LCR] Executive [LCR]=- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Verodoxys
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 18454 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:57 PM |
>math is the language of nature :(
A PYTHAGOREAN
RUN |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Pragmatic
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12942 |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:59 PM |
A bit difficult to follow.
The Shade |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:59 PM |
| Speaking of math, I need help with algebra 2. I suck at higher level math. (Other than geometry) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tonitoni
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6429 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:59 PM |
Yes and no.
I'd say you need to prove g>c first for g>z>c to be true.
Simply because the conditions could have changed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:59 PM |
2+2=5
-LSF commander Coolbigkiller50-
=3 liek me mathe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 01:59 PM |
Simple. If z>c and c>g, then z>g.
However, if g>z, then z is not greater than c.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:01 PM |
"I'd say you need to prove g>c first for g>z>c to be true."
This is under the condition that z>c and c>g.
If those conditions exist, z>g.
However, if it is proven that g>z, then this condition is proven to be false. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tonitoni
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6429 |
|
| |
|
thea96
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 37634 |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:04 PM |
Assumed condition is this. z>c c>g
Now, if g>z is proven to be the case, then z isn't greater than c, as c>g>z under that circumstance.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:05 PM |
Is this supposed to be complicated, because it's really not. Also, if you were attempting to reference a true clan situation, I didn't get it.
☠ \M/ ☠ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8SunTzu8
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8199 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:05 PM |
2 + 2 = [3,5]
Sheesh, get it right.
Anyway, this is not true in the terms of clans, as there are far more variables involved. Each clan fights differently, and at different locations, etc... Therefore, you'd need to have a very comprehensive list of variables and their values towards power or winning a battle/war in order to compare the clans. (Each clan value is based on other values, which change depending on the conditions).
It's like football games. Team A is not better than Team C, but Team C beat Team B, and Team A beat Team B, because of how these teams might compare and contrast with play styles, players, and the effectiveness of each of their sub-teams.
"If you want to become a Developer or Innovator for CSA, contact me." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
thea96
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 37634 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:06 PM |
So basically it is
G>C>Z
But then
Z>G
So
Everything is false
Conspiracy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:07 PM |
This isn't supposed to be complicated, however, it is supposed to respond to the posts by a certain individual (who has yet to read it).
Tis a response that mathematically proves a concept.
@Sun I would argue that more variables are involved in actual affairs, however, this is the simplest representation of the concept. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:08 PM |
@thea Pretty much. It displays that the inequality isn't true. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
thea96
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 37634 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:15 PM |
| Clans can not be explained by math. Way to much human variables in it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2013 02:16 PM |
I have math tech... I dont understand.
Why is it whenever I make a thread, you ignore me? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|