|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:12 PM |
who cares how many defenders are present?
if a clan is over 10k members, they should atleast be expected to keep their own base defended. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:16 PM |
i am tire of raids not being official because there arent enough defenders
it is bull crap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:19 PM |
^ lol agreed
{-The Legion-} |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bomber926
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2848 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:20 PM |
Counter:Idiots will be idiots ~USF was here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:21 PM |
| GSC vs UN invasions, psp claims many of the raids were invalid because no proof was provided that there were 5 JC at the beginning, as they have thousands of member, they should be able to assist the defense of their fort? That's what you're implying. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:22 PM |
@Anthony
I am saying that for every clan who has a "minimum defenders" rule Now, I understand this about small clans. But clans with 30k+ members?
This is unacceptable. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bomber926
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2848 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:23 PM |
| Almost all the raiders saw pspjohn1's forum, he said empty server raiding was aloud, he himself said that if JC was not present, it is their fault for not having the responsibility to keep in touch with the rest of the troops in empty raids, this is what I implied with proof and reason. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2013 06:26 PM |
| Yet the a high rank of JC is in agreement with what you are implying when it is in his favor, but disagrees when the table turns. Or is it a pure misinterpretation from my part and he always have been in agreement with the fact GSC won? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|