Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:02 PM |
I'll make this short, easy and simple for everyone to understand clearly.
quote
Raiding three to four clans and launching an organized attack on one (JC) does not mean you've defeated the whole alliance.
Assuming that UST and JC represent the entire UN is arrogant, misinformed and false. I suggest that instead of declaring victory over many, claim it once you've "defeated" (photo legality still being debated?) one. Please don't rush to conclusions next time, GSC/C&G. Thank you for your time.
-The Prime
Everyone: John is just going to declare victory no matter what *everyone declares victory no matter what*
Everyone: John is a hypocrite *nobody accepts any logic from the other side of the fray*
Everyone: The UN is defeated! *only 3 UN clans were raided*
Everyone: John's just using this final battle as an excuse, mad support!! *declares victory about 10 times*
- The Nox |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
michaek
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1448 |
|
| |
|
Vecrow
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 6763 |
|
| |
|
Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:06 PM |
| I haven't read all of the replies to Merely's thread yet, but I don't see any proof that a ROBLOX developer sent him a PM guanranteeing his side won over JC. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:07 PM |
HELO FOLKS BILLY MAIZE HERE
PLS INSTAL UR NEW operation gsc cage 2DAY
http://www.roblox.com/operation-GSC-item?id=103109346 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lavagrunt
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 676 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:08 PM |
"Everyone: John is just going to declare victory no matter what *everyone declares victory no matter what*" Do you mean as Everyone as in JC? Like, literally, not everyone does decalre victory. Most SuperClan leaders are honest people, and you seem to not understand that.
Everyone: John is a hypocrite *nobody accepts any logic from the other side of the fray* This made my day. I couldn't stop laughing.
Everyone: The UN is defeated! *only 3 UN clans were raided* Umm...no. Many of my commrades and myself raided many UN forts, including JC Fort fang, your fort, UST, and a couple other small clan groups. Other groups such as TRA, RSF and mainly RAT were raiding.
Everyone: John's just using this final battle as an excuse, mad support!! *declares victory about 10 times* John and the entire UN knows they've lost. Of course, John wants to get around that and ask for a final battle, so he has a second chance of winning this war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:08 PM |
The GSC has NOT won over the UN.
..Yet.
But, we have won against JC, which is why we installed snake cages.
The GSC will most likely be raiding the hell out of every UN clan soon, relax. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alpha5001
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10745 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:08 PM |
ust
is junk
camma is a fool
and eac beats ust |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Artlens5
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:09 PM |
Wel, John has been acting very childish and arrogant about this, refusing to admit defeat even though the proof is in front of him. I wouldn't say GSC defeated the UN, just JC. Oh yeah, UST left the UN as well.
~Hail the 501st!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:13 PM |
"Most SuperClan leaders are kind, honest people"
I'm sorry, but I differ on that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alpha5001
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10745 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:14 PM |
fail> ust thats how bad it is |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:17 PM |
| I've honestly never met someone from UST before. I can't say if they're a good clan or not, but the drama and them relating to how the UN "lost" isn't needed or true. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
michaek
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1448 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:21 PM |
@lava:
1) What is "decalre" 2) What did I imply about Superclan leaders and honesty 3) Name one side that hasn't declared either victory or "unfinished" in this war 4) You raided us about 2 times. The only GSC attack on us that I can recall was by x-legion, who, despite outnumbering us, ended up retreating soon after. 5) RAT, TRA, and all those other groups BARELY went to any UN forts other than JC's and maybe UST (who kind of misbehaved anyway). 6) "John and the entire UN knows they've lost. Of course, John wants to get around that and ask for a final battle, so he has a second chance of winning this war." Tell me more about how honest most superclan leaders are.
UST was voted out (without psp!), so they are irrelevant at this point.
@mag: Does that mean that you're accepting psp's final battle request and/or you're denying fruitbox's victory proclamation?
~Nox Manebit; The Night Shall Remain!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:21 PM |
@gas
their leader has a lisp irl
idk if that helps you
but, here, take my kind information<3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
romuluz
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18124 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:21 PM |
I would support this, HOWEVER, John said himself if the GSC provided pictures of the 30 wins(50+ were provided) then the GSC wins. This was completed and John claimed victory. He has lost and refuses to admit it.
Coming from a neutral party.
~Lone Wolf. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:23 PM |
"Does that mean that you're accepting psp's final battle request and/or you're denying fruitbox's victory proclamation?
"final battle request"
BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
No.
"denying fruitbox's victory proclamation?"
No, I am saying that is is most likely that we'll keep invading.
Fruit most likely directed the win to JC, not the UN.
Just a typo, calm your beans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fireroo1
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 5965 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:48 PM |
Hmmmm.......True.....Mabye I should group shout this In JC.....
Im a Ex Colonel and getting rank back.... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meto02
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11373 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:49 PM |
didnt even realize this was a real clan till today.
✯ RAT Admiral ✯ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
michaek
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1448 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 08:54 PM |
@So your thousands of members screaming "UN HAS FALEN VICTERY!!" are all wrong? Just clarifying...
@Rom Thanks for the input - you seem reasonable. I'd argue that by saying that the GSC really can't prove their absolute victory. There are multiple factors - I know for a fact that Non-GSC clans raided and won against JC on that day, so, who is to say a single RSF member didn't come in 10 seconds before capture and screenshot the win, claiming it for GSC? Also, Merely's so-called proof is non-provable - there is literally NO actual evidence that a dev told him they were legit photos... And frankly, even if they were, there are still far too many factors when determining the winner of such a large-scale raid. It was a first page game during the invasion - tons of non-GSC probably were there.
The above response can sum up my reply to everyone claiming GSC win with very little evidence - but Rom, thanks, you're the only one who I've responded to that isn't hostile.
~Nox Manebit; The Night Shall Remain~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
|
| 09 Jan 2013 09:10 PM |
@meto
Congratulations, you're that much smarter now! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
romuluz
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18124 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Gasleaks
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4077 |
|
| |
|
b3njam1n
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 19389 |
|
|
| 10 Jan 2013 02:54 PM |
Umm.
UST isn't even in the UN anymore. They don't represent us at all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
b3njam1n
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 19389 |
|
|
| 10 Jan 2013 02:55 PM |
| Oh you're complaining that people are saying that...lol my bad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|