|
| 18 Dec 2012 05:58 PM |
Alright, so NFC mass raids DNE today, and DNE wins the defense. Then, when DNE rushes to second server, NFC raids again really quickly and before you know it, it is a full server of NFC who already lost in the server, while the others are in the second one. Now, I am thinking about making the rule so the same clan cannot raid the same server twice in a row. Do you think it would be valid to apply such rule? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Merely
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17266 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:00 PM |
DNE had no rules about the raid ending if DNE holds for a certain period of time. If it was in the rules we would have gladly abided by it, but you all just deserted the server saying the raid was invalid, when there was no rule about that. If you want to make it a rule, put it in a forum thread with a link in the place description, or better yet, put it in that rule GUI you have.
Also, Topixa has no such rule limiting raiders. If you were to undertake such an action, we might have to do the same at Topixa. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:02 PM |
I know I didn't have the rule up before, which is why I'm adding it now.
And I think that this is the right way to go, so I'd actually encourage you to add it to Topixa. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bob104810
|
  |
| Joined: 22 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 354 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:05 PM |
| You can't go adding rules mid-war without getting permissions from both Director of Wars/ the Clan leader. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:07 PM |
| Let me guess then, you do not give me permission? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:07 PM |
It appears to me that in the wars NFC are winning, the clan we are against changes the rules to their advantage.
This happened again RoC when we mass raided Tierra. Devin then shut down the server and made it 20 players, moved RoC's spawns, and make our weapons weaker.
Nonetheless, it is your base.
_NFC SIC FA5 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:08 PM |
| And it's not such a big rule, it's after raids. Doesn't even affect raids, only after.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1eggnog
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7074 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:09 PM |
| I consider it unfair that we won the server, and NFC waits for us to start leaving before they switch to the raiders team again. I feel it would be a valid rule. NFC can go ahead and add similar rules if they want. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:09 PM |
It has nothing to do with us losing, it has to do with NFC switching to raiders and raiding again, when we thought we had won so we left. I couldn't care less if I lost, it's supposed to be more on the "friendly side" anyway.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:10 PM |
> Doesn't even affect raids, only after..
If there was a raid afterward, it would effect that.
_NFC SIC FA5 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jman88s
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 19445 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:11 PM |
Be quiet, Mr. Shutdown Shadow--Empire
~Dance the safety dance!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1eggnog
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7074 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:11 PM |
| Go to a new server. If we won the raid in the server, we won that server. Seems completely logical to me. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:11 PM |
| But read what egg said as well. That's exactly what happened here. If we win the server, we win the server. That should be the end of the story. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:12 PM |
@random The rightful leader of SE gave me it to convert SE into DNE. Do your research.
I'm just trying to prevent this from happening again, @NFC |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bob104810
|
  |
| Joined: 22 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 354 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:12 PM |
> I know I didn't have the rule up before, which is why I'm adding it now.
There was not a rule. The issue now is you trying to change rules.
~Nightfall Clan Chancellor |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:19 PM |
If we don't approve the rule, then as long as the war last. It cannot be changed.
_NFC SIC FA5 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1eggnog
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7074 |
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:29 PM |
No rules will be changed.
Still, we will be doing something about this loophole without affecting game-play. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 06:55 PM |
Or you know, we could go Topixa style so that you cannot "win" a defense unless all the raiders leave. It is much better that way, AND you can raid as long as you wish.
~Eat crayons, poop rainbows.~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|