|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:34 PM |
The official rules of Fort Kopervich must be followed at all times, regardless of status or clan affiliation. This guide is subject to updates based on inconsistencies, revisions, or unforeseen problems that may arise in the future, so please check back periodically for the latest version.
Combat:
-Shooting through bricks or around corners is considered exploiting a fallacy in the gun's scripting, and is prohibited.
-Crouching along seamlines (such as sliding from the cliff to the sniper tower, or bypassing the lava obby) is considered exploiting a fallacy in ROBLOX's design platform, and is prohibited.
-If you are found to be above the battleground of the map (on top of the nonreachable cliffs), you will be asked to remain within the logical boundaries *once*. Another violation of this rule, after your first warning, is prohibited. If someone has been warned in different servers in the past, and a high rank in another server knows this, then the warning may be disregarded.
-UAF members attacking Civilians and/or Allies is prohibited, and any in-game punishments may be followed by punishments within the main group or divisions.
-On the flip side, Civilians/Allies attacking UAF members, even in relatiation, is also prohibited.
Etiquette:
-Bypassing the filter is prohibited.
-Racial slurs are prohibited.
-Religious discussion is prohibited.
-While 'flaming' or 'insults' are allowed, should it escalate into an argument, all participants will be banned- advocates for either side included.
-Braggarts are exceptionally annoying, and statements such as "I killed DH", "I killed LordVade", "Hey benblue9, my KO-WO ratio is better than yours", etc are prohibited.
-Spamming (one person repeating the same messages [soccerball regeneration messages included] multiple times) is prohibited.
-Threatening to exploit/'hack'/harm someone else is prohibited (and immature, seriously, grow up).
-Immaturity (speaking of inappropriate or controversial topics carelessly, threatening bodily harm to someone, speaking of another player's family, etc) is prohibited, though context is important.
What you interpret as a joke or a playful jest may not be taken that way by others.
-Not all Permanently Exiled members have been script-banned from Koperivch. Should one (or more, of course) be found raiding or acting rudely at Kopervich, a ban, possibly followed by a script-ban, shall be instituted.
-UAF members and allies are not obligated to defend against raids with less than five raiders, should they persist for over 1 hour and 30 minutes.
-Anything listed as improper behavior within the UAF guidelines, codex, and constitution is also prohibited here.
Successful Raiding:
-At least 4 *dedicated* UAF team members must be present for a raid to count
*dedicated, meaning UAF team members who are not in, or working for, an enemy clan (for example, an x-101st member cannot join the UAF team to make an empty server raid official)
-At least 5 raiders must be present for a raid to count.
-The timer will reach 1500, and will flash a unique raid ID. You must have the entire win message, along with the ID screenshotted or recorded for a win to count.
This allows us to tell apart duplicates, to prevent win fraud, or wins shared between multiple clans.
(That's it. That's the only way to win at Kopervich.
Any win that isn't accompanied by a *unique* raid ID isn't a win.)
[UAFWARGEN] Mewtwo
[UAF 3iC] False
[UAFCOM] ~DH~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:34 PM |
this was obviously made because ryan complained about it.
[ Team Acquisitive ] Axel |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:34 PM |
we have matching antlers bb
-022 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:35 PM |
| I like Fort Kopervich. Its actually one of the only bases that's fair. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:35 PM |
| How do the raiders know they're "dedcated"?....... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:36 PM |
@Super
A clan would be expected to know their own, aye? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:37 PM |
@TA
Once again you continue to assume, further ruining your image of having infallible information sources.
No.
~DH~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
| |
|
nahom007
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18274 |
|
| |
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
| |
|
Solotaire
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30356 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:40 PM |
"-While 'flaming' or 'insults are allowed" Against the ROBLOX rules 0/10 you lose don't try again |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Celestus
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14873 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:41 PM |
Stupid list. A few base customisations will eliminate the majority of the flaws, which are only accountable upon your behalf, seeming you created the place.
As for bypassing the filters and Religious talk, that should be left to Roblox.
I hate this whole 'YOU CANT FLAME' business. Let people do as they wish and leave them accountable to the Roblox justice system, which I'll admit is pretty bi polar, however the only real fair way to do something. What may be seen as flame to you may not be seen in the same way to someone else.
The worse thing about this instatement of rules is that they can easily be made up or the opposite, opaque. How do you prove or even see that a player has shot through a brick, he may have fired, then moved into a position behind a brick. Knowing the typical UAF HR system, they will use it to their advantage and ban the player.
Eh, the decision isn't up to me and you can do what you please but I am certainly never re-visiting a UAF map while these rules are in place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:42 PM |
"Once again you continue to assume, further ruining your image of having infallible information sources.
No."
you're assuming that we have no infallible info sources, yet you're unaware of that. you think that just because i don't know the direct answer as to why you make an insignificant rules thread i don't have any reliable sources, i can make my hypotheses anytime i wish? why would i waste my time consulting to a high rank of yours over a kopervich rules forum?
what led me to my assumption? well the fact that ryan complained as to why he was banned from kopervich just minutes ago and engaged in a verbal fight with a general of yours regarding the topic of a permanent exile and how that is relevant to koper. then we have this thread right here minutes after.
buahahahah.
[ Team Acquisitive ] Administrator Axel
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:42 PM |
I like how people bother to write up responses to this, hating on it.
Yet it won't change anything. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:43 PM |
Solo, we aren't going to ban players for something that ROBLOX reports can take care of.
If you feel personally insulted by something that someone else says, use the in-game report feature to have ROBLOX be the judge.
Too many arguments spawn from removing a player from a game for a statement that can be interpreted different ways by different people.
~DH~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Solotaire
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30356 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:44 PM |
"▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬[//Directory\\]▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ [1] Legend [2] Rules of Defending and Raiding...
[2] ▬▬▬▬▬ Rules of Defending and Raiding
- No unnecessary talking. - - You may only talk stragetically, giving your position, where defenders are, which gate to open, if defenders have gotten pass you, and small talk is allowed...
- No flaming. - - Flaming goes with unncessary talking."
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:45 PM |
"-Braggarts are exceptionally annoying, and statements such as "I killed DH", "I killed LordVade", "Hey benblue9, my KO-WO ratio is better than yours", etc are prohibited."
What kind of a rule is this? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nahom007
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18274 |
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:45 PM |
Solo.
I guess x-101st should be reported as well?
I remember the time when x-101st flamed the heck out of UAF and the x-101st High Rank [Not stating who it is.] did nothing about it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Solotaire
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30356 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:45 PM |
| Also, not banning for mild flame is completely different than saying flaming is allowed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Adversity
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2912 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:45 PM |
TENAL 4 UAF
[BLAME CJ // Xon Legion Owner] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
richy8447
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 6222 |
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:46 PM |
1. solo just won.
2. "I like how people bother to write up responses to this, hating on it.
Yet it won't change anything."
okay just because these rules are supportive in your favor, doesn't mean you can't expect us to complain about it.
[ Team Acquisitive ] Administrator Axel |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:47 PM |
@Team
Just because you cry about it doesn't mean it'll get fixed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2012 01:47 PM |
It was not mild flame.
And mild flaming is still flaming.
~bullet in da chamb~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|