|
| 18 Nov 2012 03:37 PM |
HOW THIS WORKS: Numerous bills and issues shall be set on the 'table' for senators to vote on. WHO CAN VOTE: Only elected senators, and Chairmen who are officially of that rank in the Congress group. WHEN THEY CAN VOTE: 24 Hours from when this is posted, Senators can vote for the issues and post opinions. HOW THEY VOTE: Each law on the 'table' will be numbered. A Senator has the right to vote 'Yes' 'No' or 'Abstain' (Abstain is where you don't vote at all on the issue). For example, on the first law I might write '1.) Yes.' Senators and members may post opinions about the laws on the table. Laws up for 'EDIT' is not to be voted on, but is to be suggested on. For example: "1.) I suggest that 'Insert Quote Here' should be changed to 'Insert Here'" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BILLS/LAWS ON THE TABLE: Author (TheDarkDerek) Rank Change Act (http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=81294051) Up for VOTE ON EDITS
The President Vetoed the bill, these are his edits.
1.) Make it optional for the Chairman to be put at the rank. The only exception: The rank he must be currently at must already give him basic requirements for Chairman, aka, posting to status.
2.) Make it so that the rank the Chairman is at before promoted to Chairman rank, must be logged.
3.) Remove the Chairman rank's ability to promote/demote (I forget if you set that at the rank, but I can't see the context while typing this, so a just in case), and his ability to accept join requests.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How to get a Law on the 'table': PM a Chairman to get a law that you have written on the 'Table'. If the Chairman decides not to put it on the 'table', a petition of 10 'signatures' of SR members may overrule it, and cause the law to go on the 'table'.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Nov 2012 03:38 PM |
1.) Yes, I think. I don't understand the second sentence, because it has poor grammar. 2.) Yes. 3.) No. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Nov 2012 04:02 PM |
1.) No, reason being that 'I', personally, like a group where you have little freedom in choosing whether you want your own rank or not so, basically, I mean in my own little way that it shouldn't be optional to have your own rank as serving as the SR Chairman and should stick with the title and the rank.
2.) No 3.) No |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
zephurus
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2447 |
|
|
| 18 Nov 2012 07:09 PM |
1)Yes 2)Yes 3)Can you suggest an edit to an edit...? If not then yes, otherwise, I would like that to be changed to: The chairman rank will be given the ability to promote/demote only if the chairman's previous rank could do this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
quickpick
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 25 |
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 09:36 AM |
1.) Yes 2.) Yes 3.) I agree with Zephurus, if we are allowed to suggest an edit, : The chairman rank will be given the ability to promote/demote only if the chairman's previous rank had the ability to promote/demote. If we can't suggest an edit, then Yes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 07:05 PM |
| *Vote Change* 1.) No. I agree with Scooby. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 07:11 PM |
Voting closed. Edit 1 and 3 have failed. Edit 2 has passed. Final tally:
1.) 3 No - 3 Yes 2.) 6 Yes - 0 No 3.) 3 No - 3 Yes |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|