Rushour3
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 55501 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 11:45 AM |
http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=81506503
then all he said was "your argument is invalid" as an argument
i love these little kids. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
shafiq81
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 19784 |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 11:46 AM |
| dont you just love winning arguments |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
shafiq81
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 19784 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 11:47 AM |
| if there're arguments, ill just surrender. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rushour3
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 55501 |
|
| |
|
LegoADS
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 25703 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
shafiq81
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 19784 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:03 PM |
I win when gingka make an arguement.
I felt the happiness |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Eston
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 21591 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:05 PM |
| All you argued about was grammar. How pointless is that? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
123134
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9284 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:06 PM |
zEmg Rushour3 ur mah fav Forumer
i WUV U!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rushour3
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 55501 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:06 PM |
@eston
correction: all he argued about was grammar.
and i called him out on that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:09 PM |
so you called him out on his grammar by saying he doesn't use it.
YOU TOTES WIN THE ARGUMENT BY DOING THAT HUEHUEHUE
shaddup, rush |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LolMeLol1
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 43676 |
|
| |
|
0z3r
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 11414 |
|
| |
|
Eston
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 21591 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:12 PM |
| Not exactly. You first went in to say it's not "how you run a business" without giving any logic to back it up. As soon as he made a typo, it turned into a grammar war. But what I find ridiculous is how you disregard the fact you never capitalize any word in a sentence, and intentional grammar error, while all of his were mistakes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
shafiq81
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 19784 |
|
| |
|
Eston
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 21591 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:17 PM |
| Did I prove rushour3 wrong with just two posts? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:18 PM |
esty this is why i like you ok |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rushour3
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 55501 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:21 PM |
@eston
>Not exactly. You first went in to say it's not "how you run a business" without giving any logic to back it up.
i was planning on him retorting on the subject. obviously, i didn't need to.
>As soon as he made a typo, it turned into a grammar war.
right, because he derailed it to that.
>But what I find ridiculous is how you disregard the fact you never capitalize any word in a sentence, and intentional grammar error, while all of his were mistakes.
the difference is that i know how to use it, while he doesn't. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Crystoh
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16458 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:23 PM |
I agree with Eston, you didn't really give much bulk to your side of the argument granted he didn't either but yours was no better than his
maybe you can be science |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
shafiq81
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 19784 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:25 PM |
| I always see him arguring in threads. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rushour3
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 55501 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:27 PM |
@cryst
if he retorted correctly, i would have had a more drawn-out argument against it. but, he decided to ignore it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Eston
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 21591 |
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:33 PM |
"i was planning on him retorting on the subject. obviously, i didn't need to."
Saying that you "don't need to" give logic in an argument makes it pointless and for the most part, it makes you look like a troll.\
"right, because he derailed it to that."
Nope. He corrected himself, proving he does know spelling at least, and then you brought it up in the argument. Not only was it unnecessary, it's also pointless. When you called it an atrocity, you were still referring to his bad grammar. Hence, bringing it up appears as a desperate attempt to sound smarter.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Nov 2012 12:34 PM |
| I approve this post is spam. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|