mustyoshi
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2007 |
| Total Posts: 41651 |
|
|
| 02 Nov 2012 10:46 PM |
Since the graph ends at 5...
~Monica mustyoshi mustyoshi mustyoshi mustyoshi |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Riderj
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1534 |
|
|
| 02 Nov 2012 10:51 PM |
| It's a positive slope, what do you think? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Riderj
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1534 |
|
|
| 02 Nov 2012 10:52 PM |
| Ignore that haha, I've not looked at that in a while thought it was linear. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Nov 2012 11:25 PM |
| Six means your project will not only fail, but the people you worked with will steal all the credit and then give the game away for free. The person that gets the game will get famous and rich and make an account named after a word that has nothing to do with anything like "Merely" and then, whenever you buy ice cream, he will take your ice cream and throw it right at the ground. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Nov 2012 11:36 PM |
| Can efficiency be negative? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 12:31 AM |
Negative efficiency means degradation of the actual project... right?
Since positive efficiency means building up your project, but then negative would mean it is slowly eating your project? Idk.
☜▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬☞ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Merely
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17266 |
|
| |
|
SN0X
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 7277 |
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 04:28 AM |
@Candy,
Well thanks to you, we fail'd RCZero.
Haha, somebody fire this guy. No really... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LPGhatguy
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4725 |
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 04:30 AM |
You'll lose intelligence for every day working on the project.
In addition, anything you've already completed will slowly decay into nothing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 10:22 AM |
| I wonder what negative efficiency would look like in a blank environment O.e |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xSIXx
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9202 |
|
| |
|
Quenty
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9316 |
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 11:20 AM |
In that case, it would look like a taco from a Chinese restaurant.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 11:28 AM |
Tacos are mexican as Sushi is to japanese.
☜▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬☞ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 12:47 PM |
| It would appear that anything past 5 scripters is undefined. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 05:11 PM |
Evil demons would kill the sixth member to restore order in the universe.
-= I'm not paranoid. Why? Who's asking!? =- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 05:38 PM |
| According to my calculations, approximately -38.27%. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 05:58 PM |
| It wont go negative, it will obviously continue at some fancy 3D imaginary number plane and form a half-sphere or something. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Quenty
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9316 |
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 06:03 PM |
| C&G managed to do a group project. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Aaaboy97
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6612 |
|
|
| 03 Nov 2012 06:18 PM |
Meelo's law: efficiency = sqrt(1 - #scripters^2/25)
Anything beyond 5 is undefined |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Nov 2012 04:12 AM |
| or maybe its liek sin, its negative until 15 scripters but then it gets positive because theres so many people that surely some of them will get something done? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SN0X
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 7277 |
|
|
| 04 Nov 2012 04:40 AM |
@Quenty,
probably just free models and payed-for models compiled into a big mega base. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Nov 2012 04:43 PM |
What is Meelo's law? :J
~thedestroyer115, check out my sets!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Nov 2012 05:36 PM |
> or maybe its liek sin, its negative until 15 scripters but then it gets positive because theres so many people that surely some of them will get something done?
That's what I did, even though I know it's technically wrong, because I didn't want to deal with imaginary numbers. I used Y = cos((X - 1) * 22.5) * 100 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|