|
| 08 Oct 2012 12:57 PM |
"They lost, CT still has VAK on it's enemy's list because he can't get ove-"
"NO CT JUST PUT THERE TO SHOW HOSTILITY NO WARR AAAAAAAAAAAAGGH"
Anyone not in RAT, provide your arguments. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 12:57 PM |
I'm sorry, let me rephrase that last part.
Anyone NOT AFFILIATED WITH CT OR RAT, provide your arguments. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 12:58 PM |
| RAT hasn't gotten over that war, because they know they can't cover up how they lost it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Epicrules
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 6732 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:01 PM |
| You're associated with VAK and provided an argument, I believe RAT has their right to respond. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
masmusk
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3753 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:03 PM |
| I would say VAK won, but mate, you're an Austratt. You are in no position at all to comment on cover-ups. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:03 PM |
VAK's fire melted `Frost`ria
⊂=〔☀Infernian President Caesar☀〕=⊃ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
saltydude
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1765 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:04 PM |
Rat lost....... VAK has all the proof, after the war when VAK had won CT found that celeste was too fair so he made V2 which was way to unfair. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:04 PM |
shut up ian
no-one asked ramrodia to try and be tough |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:05 PM |
"you're an Austratt. You are in no position at all to comment on cover-ups."
>has been in Austratt for 2 days
>nice stereotype of clan members moron |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SpySapper
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8184 |
|
| |
|
bloxman26
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7509 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:07 PM |
From a member count standpoint, you could say that VAK won because they are smaller and they won raids on rat, but you could also say that rat is bigger and therefore won more raids.
There was no final battle, there was no official raid count.
Vaktus and CT agreed to end it, nobody won, nobody lost. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:08 PM |
"From a member count standpoint, you could say that VAK won because they are smaller and they won raids on rat, but you could also say that rat is bigger and therefore won more raids.
There was no final battle, there was no official raid count.
Vaktus and CT agreed to end it, nobody won, nobody lost."
"that rat is bigger than therefore won more raids."
>rat barely actually raided
>final battle post-poned so many times
>"lets tie ok" vaktus, after tired of dealing with ct "fine" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:12 PM |
@Xal
Thank you, Captain Obvious. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bloxman26
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7509 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:12 PM |
Look at it from an unbaised standpoint, where you do not support either party.
Vaktus was tired of CT
CT was tired of Vaktus
They couldn't agree on anything, both paranoid somebody would gain some unfair advantage and win; because Vaktus saw VAK as the dominant clan over RAT, same with CT towards VAK, and I'm sure he didn't want to get beaten by a clan with 500 members(excluding VAC).
They tired of dealing with each other so they agreed, for once, to end it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Arcarius
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 20844 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:15 PM |
You actually said it yourself.
They hated each other, couldn't deal with each other, and tied.
No matter where you get the story, it's all biased, there's no concrete evidence of either doing what they say the other did.
<3, Your mortal enemy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:15 PM |
i remember when i'd try to defend RAT, it was too hard. the teammates weren't good, their skill wasn't good.
vak won for sure. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:21 PM |
Even I know RAT lost the war.
>Is RAT
Add 1756 posts to my post count ~DA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:25 PM |
| Regardless of the fact that Vaktus said whoever left the battle early would lose it and thus the war, and he left, you can continue to spout your uninformed lolpinions. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
KingEpic5
|
  |
| Joined: 26 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 5675 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:28 PM |
| Apparently "ties" don't mean anything? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
GGGGG14
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 25344 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:28 PM |
| @Ct, your statements are so non-opinionated... every statement without proof is by definition an opinion, so basically whatever you or anyone else here says is just stupid :p |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:31 PM |
Not a tie. A tie implies we both fought fairly and came up with no victor. What really happened is that me and Vaktus are about as compatible as two north magnets. As a result nearly every single thing we planned failed - including the final battle, which by the way I will take zero blame for as the only reason it flopped was because of his refusal to take two teams and make the place private to prevent stalkers (because he wanted server swarming? honestly I have no idea.)
But then Xal here sits on his high horse and pretends that everyone who disagrees with him are merely my "drones" and hold zero opinion or knowledge of true events when he is shamelessly doing that right now.
There was no tie, no victor, nothing. That wasn't a war, that was a disaster. Nothing came of it and Vaktus only declared victory because we originally did when we won that first FB - something he turned around and claimed we didn't do, against his OWN rules. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
GGGGG14
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 25344 |
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:31 PM |
| I love when he ignores my true comments and keep writing paragraphs of shameful opinions ^ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Oct 2012 01:33 PM |
Honestly unless you were a VAK General or an RAT Admiral during the time of the war and you still feel like you have the right to form an opinion on the matter, I can't really think of you as anything other than dumb.
None of you know what happened. None of you were there. It's like biting into just an apple skin and saying "WOW APPLES ARE BAD BECUS THE SKIN IS BITTER"
The situation was complicated, you only know what you saw and what you saw was very minor compared to what actually happened. Move on, get over it, you don't know anything about the situation. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|