meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:50 PM |
| Disprove me, you degenerates. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:53 PM |
| Cuz liek, the 2 means two, 2 of those is 4 nob .3. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
kevin756
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11244 |
|
| |
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:55 PM |
@Vincent
Take two pieces of rope. Tie two knots in them. To add them together you would have to tie a new knot, which makes 5 knots. As that knot was not part of the equation, but a product of it, it does not make the equation 2+2+1, but it stays as 2+2. Thus, 2+2=5. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:55 PM |
| ok so lets say you have 2 cookies. you eat those two cookies and now you have two cookies in your tummy k? so then your mom gives you two more cookies. you eat one out of two of your cookies and now you have 3 cookies in your tummy. then later you take out your last cookie. you eat your last cookie and that means that now you have 4 cookies in your tummy. so yes is 4. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:56 PM |
@average
Read my last post.
QQ pls |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:56 PM |
"Take two pieces of rope. Tie two knots in them. To add them together you would have to tie a new knot, which makes 5 knots. As that knot was not part of the equation, but a product of it, it does not make the equation 2+2+1, but it stays as 2+2. Thus, 2+2=5."
thats not what the calculator says |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:57 PM |
| I HAVE TWO BUTTCHEEKS, YOU HAVE TWO BUTTCHEEKS. BUT OUR TOUCHING BUTTCHEEKS MAKE ONE BIG BUTTCHEEK. THUS, 2+2=3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:57 PM |
@zk
The calculator isn't able to process it correctly. You can't tie a knot in a calculator, can you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:57 PM |
really... i dont think many people will get that
[~If I Had~] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:58 PM |
"The calculator isn't able to process it correctly. You can't tie a knot in a calculator, can you?"
you cant tie a knot to prove a math problem can you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:59 PM |
But conventional, written math does not include ropes or knots. Your argument is invalid. And the extra knot you had to tie is unrelated to the question, but is rather a matter of bonding the ropes.
-Mr. Carpainter Bluenior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2012 11:59 PM |
@zk
Err... Did I not just prove it? Note how I did not say in all circumstances the sum was 5. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:00 AM |
@fruit
Not all math, be it conventional or not, is written. If you are adding the ropes together it is math, thus making it relevant to my argument. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:02 AM |
CALCULATORS DO NOT USE BUTTCHEEKS, THUS YOUR ARGUEMENT IS INVALID. B
I
T
C
H
PLEASE |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:03 AM |
@turtle
Your filterpassing techniques are marvelous. Teach me your ways. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:07 AM |
So, by your logic, 2 + 2 = 5, which means that, as potato said...
If 2 + 2 = 5
And 5 - 2 = 3
And 3 + 2 = 5
Then 3 + 2 = 2 + 2
But, on the contrary, 2 + 2 does not equal 2 + 3
Thus, proving your statement invalid.
-Mr. Carpainter Bluenior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:49 AM |
PuhLEEEEEEEASE. It's not five, it's twenty two. :D --- [~Taunting Death...means pitting oneself against a wily enemy who cannot lose.~] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 12:51 AM |
Just doing something random.
Not sure this even makes sense.
2+2=5 in an alternate universe
Medal pl0x |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meldo
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 61512 |
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 01:00 AM |
"But, on the contrary, 2 + 2 does not equal 2 + 3"
That doesn't prove me wrong, that's simply stating something that is true. I never once said that it equaled 2+3. I even specifically said that it was still 2+2. Did you even bother reading my argument? Anyways, I'm going to go play Mount & Blade now. Farewell. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Milbert23
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 23533 |
|
|
| 08 Sep 2012 01:01 AM |
| its his opinioin doent start flamewar plz |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|