|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:09 AM |
Apparently the last one was too hard, so...
Two girls were born, from the same mother. However, they are not related by twins. How is this possible? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
corfish67
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2528 |
|
| |
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:10 AM |
| two dads at two different times |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:10 AM |
Wrong.
I'm gonna accept three differant answers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:11 AM |
Oh shoot. I forgot to include this.
Two girls were born at the same time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:11 AM |
| They weren't look-a-like twins. They were just born at the same time. It's possible. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:11 AM |
| SP, no. The technical term would still be twins. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
knolligge
|
  |
| Joined: 30 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 262 |
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:12 AM |
The two babies are two of a set of triplets Thank you, google! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:12 AM |
| Yes, that would be correct. Anyone care to try for the other answer? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:12 AM |
| Note how I said look-a-like twins. The catch is that they developed separately, but still got born at the same time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EarthsAlt
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 545 |
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:13 AM |
| were they part of a set of triplets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EarthsAlt
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 545 |
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:13 AM |
DAMNIT I DIDN'T SEE THAT ANSWER BEFORE ME >:( |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:14 AM |
Oh. SP, you got the other answer.
Just.. LET IT MAKE MORE SENSE! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 10:14 AM |
| To be specific, it could be [x]lets, where X > 2. Quadruplets? Yep. Quintuplets, Octuplets, Dodacuplets or something, etc. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|