|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:14 AM |
Remember when those circle studs were removed back in 2009 because LEGO was trying to sue ROBLOX?
Well now that ROBLOX is partnered with LEGO, it could be possible that if we used the circle studs again, ROBLOX wouldn't get sued.
And no, the circle studs DON'T have to be default. They could be in the category that displays Wedges, glue, etc.,
:] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:19 AM |
Remember when you read the WNTS? Oh right you didn't so read them! ~The pimp of S&I and C&G~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:20 AM |
!!!
Whoops, sorry. Didn't notice that rule. I just glanced at them before. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:21 AM |
But lets here why I don't support. Cause most people now adays use the Stamper tool or smooth bricks OR Textures.I think the Circle studs were ugly any way.
~The pimp of S&I and C&G~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
CBD55
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 347 |
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:22 AM |
| i kinda like the square studs... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:43 AM |
No support. LEGO will be angry when ROBLOX unpartners them anyway, and they might sue ROBLOX again if they reimplement the circular studs. Therefore we will stick with the square ones, it shows a better effect on universal.
~+ Period. <-- Periodception +~
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
luigi010
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2898 |
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 08:46 AM |
| i think the circle ones were UGLEH anyways |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 09:00 AM |
| They had circle studs WAY before you were here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 09:02 AM |
| No, the circle studs were quite bad-looking any way. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 09:25 AM |
| Enough with the nostolgia. They won't come back. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 09:27 AM |
| Nick shut up you're an 11'er you weren't there. I'm a new account of an '07 account. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:03 AM |
| I did like the circle ones, but LEGO would get greedy as usual and sue ROBLOX. I'm accually surprised LEGO hasn't sued ROBLOX yet for the 3.0 bodies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:05 AM |
| I'm surprised they aren't sued MORE for that package that looks exactly like a LEGO person |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
alkia
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 25645 |
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:08 AM |
''~The pimp of S&I and C&G~''
lolno |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:15 AM |
| The 3.0 lean more towards KRE-O. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:17 AM |
| Well I thought ROBLOX once sponsered KRE-O. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:21 AM |
Guys, you realize Lego's copyright ended?
That's why there are so many products now that look suspiciously similar to Lego. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:22 AM |
| If we can get LEGO's attention back to here, and sue ROBLOX again for the 3.0 bodies, they would probably remove them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:23 AM |
Recruit-
THAT'S WHY I SAW AN ALMOST EXACT COPY OF LEGOS IN BIG LOTS THE OTHER DAY. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Aug 2012 10:25 AM |
@rock
Lego can't sue, because their patent ended.
Plus, even if they could, their would be some regard of what it says at the bottom of the screen, namely: "ROBLOX is not sponsored, authorized, or endorsed by any producer of plastic building bricks, including the LEGO Group, MEGA Brands" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|