dasae99
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 218 |
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:34 AM |
This thread's idea came from RT.We are here to discuss our universe,the multiverse theory etc.
So,who wants to start? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:35 AM |
Universe is big.
~IT'S THE APPETIZER!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:35 AM |
| Has anyone seen the video "The Afterlife Dysfunction" by AtheneWins on Youtube? It's extremely interesting. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dasae99
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 218 |
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:37 AM |
| It's somewhat related to the universe but is more focused on the possibility of an afterlife. Thought it'd be a nice thing to post here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:37 AM |
| why was it in RT if it wasnt relating to roblox wat |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:38 AM |
If Ida (asteroid belt) was a chunk off of a planet, which planet would it most likely be a chunk of? It could be covered in a layer of ice. It could be a chunk of Mercury, even. Though the Earth's Moon is more likely, seeing as Ida is a white ball of earth. It could be a frozen piece of Mars, though. They both have very thin atmospheres.
~IT'S THE APPETIZER!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:39 AM |
Oh okey great. Basically from my understanding, the general idea is every possible action you/anyone/anything in this universe makes has an infinite amount of things that can be altered in an infinite amount of parallel universes.
Lets say you have a dust particle somewhere in the middle of the void. It could move .000001 inches forwards at any given time. In another universe it could move .01 inches forward, in another it could completely defy physics and do a teleport jump to billions of light years away (thats going more into quantum physics). But basically, it means anything is possible. Anything. Some of the universes are so similar to our own that its impossible to tell, a single like grain of sand could be missing from the beach and that is all, sadly that causes the butterfly effect so other things would be changed as it follows (no chaos theory from me tonight).
ANYWAYS. These universes are connected by subspace via wormholes which are thought to be black holes connected to eachother, but noone really knows (more quantum physics).
done. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:39 AM |
| Ideas about the end of the universe? I've always found the Big Rip theory plausible. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:42 AM |
@Mike
I've always found the Big Crunch theory possible. The theory which states that it may be possible that one day, the ever-expanding universe's gravity will reverse and crunch into a smaller universe, which would most likely crash all the planets and stars together, proving or disproving Nibiru or "Planet X".
~IT'S THE APPETIZER!~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:43 AM |
@mika (more parallel universe crap) The universe technically can end at any given moment with any random reason. It also already has an infinite amount of times in parallel universes, just not this one yet.
If your going for more realistic things, the universe has more dark matter in it than light matter. The balance of light/dark matter determines if the universe is growing or shrinking. It used to be shrinking, but now it is growing again, making the entire universe being compacted into a infinitely small dot impossible. Proof of this is from red shifts from objects traveling faster than the speed of light away from us with the Doppler effect. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:44 AM |
| Nibiru/Planet X are new to me. But what about the theory that states that all the energy gained from the newly-crushed universe would create a new big bang? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:45 AM |
| You cant have a big bang without a super-dense object to cause the implosion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:45 AM |
@Mike & Mikey
I've always been a big fan of thinking that the Universe had no beginning. It just always was on an endless/infinite timeline going both ways. I like to think of it as going through an endless series of Big Bang's & Big Crunch's. So, technically it never "ends" or "begins". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:46 AM |
| Oh. What caused a change in the amount of dark/light matter? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:47 AM |
@super Thats an interesting thought. It could be very true except for the fact that we have proof that the universe was "created" at a certain time (e.g. dates/stages of stars).
If it was infinitely going then all the matter in the universe would be a mess, its only been a short (well trillions of years) time to have the matter settle and things get into place. But then again I could be wrong. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:47 AM |
| How you're putting it, it just changes size and continues differently each time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dasae99
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 218 |
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:47 AM |
| Just finished.Very interesting. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:48 AM |
Personally, I do not believe the multiverse theory. Even if there were two multiple big bangs, thier products would still be considered part of one universe, because universe is defined as: "the totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space" , which would include the products of any big bangs, so long as they exist.
As for the big crunch theory, That doesn't make much sense, either
Scientists have found that everything is expanding faster than predicted by the big bang theory, and so theorized that there is dark matter pulling everything apart. Because that theory has more evidence supporting it, and contradicts the big crunch theory, logicaly, the big crunch theory is most likely wrong. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:48 AM |
| We could all be wrong, present. Maybe God exists, and science is all coincidence....Haha, im kidding, science got it right. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:49 AM |
and @mika again
I really didnt look into that too much. All I know is that theres more dark than light (it might be flipped lol, last time I checked dark matter made up 80% of the universe) We also know its there because of a think relating to quantum physics. You find a basically "void" where a particle should be, but nothing is there. Thats dark matter. I forget how it affects the expansion of the universe, but something to do with how its pushing stuff away. If you really want to know more, google it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:50 AM |
| What theory do you support then, awesome? The Big rip? I have found that plausible too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:51 AM |
@aws I dont see what your saying with the 2 big bang things, they are in different planes of existence, nothing at all connects us to them except what is thought to be wormholes, so we would have no way to detect them at all.
Also yea thats what I was saying about the dark matter pushing the universe apart. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:51 AM |
| Ah. I've seen a theory for space travel that states there is no void, just a roiling sea of particles colliding and destroying each and creating each other and doing it all again, so fast we can't see. An Egyptian student believe's she's found a way to push a craft in space with no fuel. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dasae99
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 218 |
|
|
| 12 Aug 2012 09:52 AM |
Well,end of the universe theories from me it is.
There is a possibility,that as the universe expands,as stars move away form each other,after trillions of years,the universe will be a cold and dark place.All stars have used up their fuel and shut off.Only rocks that used to be planets float in darkness. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|