iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:03 PM |
| since it would be easier to make an AI by copying brain synapses from a dead person with an electric current sent through their brain, it would technically bring their mind back from the dead, going against most religeon. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
omgh4xorz
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2213 |
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:04 PM |
But we already created a A.....
nvm im just getting out of OT.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:12 PM |
| Are you saying bringing a corpse back from the dead when it has died of natural causes, or just a mind and putting it in a robot or something? The brain would already have lost too much oxygen to function. It wouldn't really work. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:13 PM |
| After an immediate death, it is technically possible to put the brain on life support long enough to "Graft" an intelligent entity from it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
12estart
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1066 |
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:14 PM |
@iorn,
Well, yes. But it has to be like a five minute procedure. Your body can only go a few minutes without oxygen unless your some strange guy like David Blaine who can hold his breath for nearly ten minutes underwater. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:15 PM |
| This would mean you would have to do it the instant after somebody dies. Are we really going to murder, in the name of science and all? It sickens me how science has become so perverse. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:15 PM |
You could damage a living person's brain, so it would act like a zombie
but that's quite inhumane |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:15 PM |
| Well thats why you have "Accidential" deaths. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:17 PM |
| I'm pretty sure that goes against the geneva convention. Either way, the AI is just a remnant of what was originally a person. Assuming of the intelligence graft, it would contain part of the memories, possibly with the memory of death. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:18 PM |
| against most religions? Sure let's not make a scientific breakthrough because it's against some religions... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:19 PM |
| I would contribute my corpse to science in no time |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jul 2012 03:21 PM |
| Well, I see not how it is against most religions. Please explain. I am religious. I think it is inhumane, but I don't see how it is against religions. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|