IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:00 AM |
let's take a look.
Liberal:A liberal is someone who favors censorship of Christianity
Liberals are often anti-Christian, or otherwise disagree with moral or social principles held by many American Christians.
USA: The United States of America is the most conservative, prosperous and free nation in the world
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:04 AM |
USA: The United States of America is the most conservative, prosperous and free nation in the world
---
I lol'd. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:05 AM |
theyve got great articles like liberals and be$tyaliteh
"Global warming is the liberal hoax that the world is becoming dangerously warmer due to the human pollution of greenhouse gasses, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide."
They "debunk" evolution in their wiki too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:25 AM |
Again, there is nothing wrong about having a wikipedia. This is obviously a directed attempt to insult thepitt44.
You've been making allot of "anti-conservative" threads about various irrelevant happenings (and conservapedia). How about you attack their ideology instead? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:29 AM |
| The website is heavily baised, but doesnt reflect the views of all conservatives. I know plenty of liberal Christians. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:30 AM |
| Nothing wrong with making fun of idiots, such as WBC, Conservapedia, College communists, Tea party etc... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:33 AM |
I suppose, but it's all on a deaf ear.
This forum is only like, 2% Conservative.
Everyone else here is either an "anarchist", social democrat, classic liberal, libertarian, or socialist. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:35 AM |
This forum is only like, 2% Conservative.
Everyone else here is either an "anarchist", social democrat, classic liberal, libertarian, or socialist. __ No need to play the victim here. There's one anarchist and others are divided between left and right. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:36 AM |
| Funny thing is, i dont think we have any modern american liberals here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:36 AM |
| Yeah we don't have them. Mostly europeans and aussie/NZers are the only left here |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 09:37 AM |
I thought we had some. Oh well. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 10:55 AM |
| I can play the role of a liberal if you want... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tomato12
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4053 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:11 AM |
| And Wikipedia is so much more reliable. Stop directly attacking me you immature twit. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:14 AM |
And Wikipedia is so much more reliable.
---
At least wikipedia doesn't say that conservatives are warmongers which want a theocracy and that christianity is a delusion made by a illusionist which was too proud of himself he declared himself "the son of god". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tomato12
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4053 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:16 AM |
I can edit it to say that.
Also, please answer my point that was directed at you.
Anyways, conservative or not, it doesn't make it wrong. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:21 AM |
>Implying that edit will pass.
That edit won't pass if it's BS.
It does make it wrong since it is BS. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:22 AM |
| This Liberal-Conservative war has turned from an intellectual debate into a desperate smear campaign. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:24 AM |
| I'm just discussing with tomato if it's BS or not. He's implying that wikipedia is at least at an equal level of BS as conservapedia. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:33 AM |
@tomato
Have you even read conservapedia? That site is insane. In wikipedia you may edit whatever you want if you can post a source and anyone is able to counter your edit if they can discredit your source. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 11:42 AM |
| If you ask me both aren't the most reliable sources, every bit of information you get would have to be from a different specialized site to be as reliable as possible. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 12:58 PM |
If you ask me both aren't the most reliable sources, every bit of information you get would have to be from a different specialized site to be as reliable as possible. __ Wikipedia is reliable in most of the big articles. It's monitored and partly locked depending on the article. Thepit, just because they banned it in your school due to fear of copypasta, it doesn't make these stupid conservapedias good at all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IamLibyan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 373 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 12:59 PM |
| also sorry if ive offended you thepit. don be mad dis all only normal talkin' |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tomato12
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4053 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2012 04:28 PM |
| Im not mad. Im just saying that making this thread was not necessary. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|