gamer326
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 643 |
|
|
| 02 Apr 2012 02:20 PM |
| what ZeObot failed to get is the dissapearance/death/etc of the less fittest organisms (penicillin-resistant bugs, stags with larger horns, etc) is exactly how evolution works. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
gamer326
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 643 |
|
|
| 02 Apr 2012 06:30 PM |
| i mean natural selection, when there are significant changes in an environment (even gradual) the animals that get mutations good for this new environment survive. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ZeObot
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 647 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 01:48 PM |
mirco evolution doesn't cause changed they significantly help a creature, only macroevolution can.
So what you are saying is macroevolution can cause macroevolution. That's a circular arguement. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2012 01:57 PM |
| Big changes are caused by small changes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ZeObot
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 647 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 01:58 PM |
| But small changes are not equal to big changes and a small change is not enough by itself to cause a big change. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ZeObot
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 647 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 02:05 PM |
original thread is replaced here: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=65078393 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 02:47 PM |
| A big change cannot occur in one generation, that is impossible. Here we go, someone else who doesn't understand how evolution works. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 02:50 PM |
| It took century's, even millenniums before a small change was noticeable. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WhyTruth
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1297 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 02:51 PM |
Micro evolution and macro evolution are both ways that species evolved into todays animals
Micro is like breeds of cats growing longer hair and bigger feet over 10 generations to acustom to snow
Macro is a mutation that is succesful. I think the sabre tooth cat could have been a mutation of a large cat born with abnormal teeth but it worked and caught on. Macro is extremely rare because mutations are random and mostly dont work. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ZeObot
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 647 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 03:40 PM |
"It took century's, even millenniums before a small change was noticeable."
Natural selection cant predict millenniums in the future |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WhyTruth
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1297 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:05 PM |
Natural selection does not determin all evolution
Taller generations of humans is not because shorter people cant reach trees to get fruit so taller survive more. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:10 PM |
| It is physically impossible for a monkey to give birth to a human. Learn biology. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wreton34
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2698 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:11 PM |
| They can, but it would be infertile, I suppose. And deformed beyond recognition. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:20 PM |
| They'd look deformed because they aren't human. Deal with it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:31 PM |
| They still can, deal with it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:36 PM |
| Never could, never will. Just because like 98% of professional scientists support large portions of the theory of evolution doesn't mean it's real. I've still got 2% on my side, so HA! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WhyTruth
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1297 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:45 PM |
Humans didnt evolved from chimps
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
cuppy64
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 190 |
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 04:49 PM |
| No we didn't evolve from chimps, we were made by a magic sky man who made only two people whos children reproduced making it incest even though the DNA was so close it still did not cause massive mutations. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WhyTruth
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1297 |
|
| |
|
0Z0NE
|
  |
| Joined: 25 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7951 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
WhyTruth
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1297 |
|
|
| 25 May 2012 08:06 PM |
Hahaha
"2nd law of thermodyamics"
You are such a tool, this is one of the most used arguments by christians and its completely false in the sense you use it.
The second law of thermodynamics is the law that things in a closed system always get more chaotic and less complex. The problem is Earth is not a closed system. We recieve energy and information from space.
Faith in evolution? Faith is blind belief. Evolution is the best explanation with the facts we have of how the world is so biologicly diverse. There is no faith, there is just looking at evidence and drawing an educated conclusion.
Again, you are a tool of creationists. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|