t1mmym
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 69 |
|
|
| 23 May 2012 11:53 AM |
THIS IS ONLY AN IDEA]
As you may know, most VS divisions are being reinvented so that they're not just for status and have a purpose.
Here are a couple of them:
ENTRY:
These are just ideas, some could be there, some might not. Bloxxer badge 6000KOs Private+ Have a VS:MC obby badge.
PROMOTION:
Rather than just going to raids to get promoted (which is hars when VS is not at war [See next sector]) CP count can be used. Either ratio or just a certain amount. For Example: PFC (E-2) 10AP:3CP
ACTIVENESS:
An idea is special trainings to earn CP. They MUST be rigorous, hard and tricky. VS:MC could be at war with a group EVERY SCOND. different groups every week could be picked and then VS:MC could have raids every so aften.
~Lieutenant t1mmym. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ipax
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1220 |
|
|
| 23 May 2012 12:02 PM |
VS : shocktroopers
entry :
10 k KO's
Need to be in rangers , marine corps and main division.
captain+ (to be incharge at the forts)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
richjoel
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 273 |
|
|
| 23 May 2012 12:06 PM |
| Too many divisions, the old VS was better with less divisions |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 May 2012 12:34 PM |
In my opinion I agree with the less division thing there should only be the following divisions:
VS (obviously) VS:HR VS:R VS:LD and VS:AT
That be all -Le Alex Le- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 May 2012 02:08 PM |
| Did you say that ipax because of my awesome logo lol? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 May 2012 02:48 PM |
| Bloxxer is a terrible requirement. It would prohibit people like me from divisions simply because we do obbies and do a lot, or have friends that like using admin on us. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ackk
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 296 |
|
|
| 24 May 2012 06:55 AM |
| We have enough divisions, putting in any more would be... straining. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ipax
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1220 |
|
|
| 24 May 2012 09:25 AM |
@ryan. That made me think "Yus good idea"
I also liked the VS:ST they were in charge of the forts they could control it very well.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
t1mmym
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 69 |
|
|
| 24 May 2012 09:47 AM |
| You lot do know that VS:MC is all ready an official division..? Please don't post "Too many VS divisions!" It is unnecassary... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2012 10:43 AM |
MC is meant to be like SP, anyone can get in. This level of experience that YOU'RE saying MC would need - No. That is for Rangers.
~kindacriticalgeneralad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
t1mmym
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 69 |
|
|
| 24 May 2012 11:45 AM |
| Ad, as I said: These are a few ideas for entry. Not all together but individually... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Jun 2012 09:00 PM |
| dude, that would be something like shocktroopers. Marines, aren't quite elite, just better than the norm. If that was the requirements dude, then like, 10 people would be in it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|