|
| 19 May 2012 12:23 AM |
| if russia is so good why did they use farmers for soldiers and they only wer able to suply half of there military with guns during wwII but u.s some how was able to fight 3 countrys at one time wile russia could barley handle the germans let alone japan and italty reply to that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wandrew9
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5418 |
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:24 AM |
hey bro you brought in polotics but i dont wanna talk about those i wanna talk about the wings i ate earlier they were spicy but not too spicy yknow so i give em a 4.5/5 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:24 AM |
The only country that held off the Germans was Finland. Russia never fought the Italians Russia was the one who took Berlin. Russia was preparing an invasion of Japan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:26 AM |
| that exsplains why they lost russia prety much for a wile till they got rid of there skirts but if america wasent pounding germany on the side germany could of sent full forces to russia |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:27 AM |
German focused its entire army on the Soviets. the US, which entered the war pretty late into it, only faced about 30% of the German army.
Russia still beat Germany, so I don't get what you're trying to get at here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:28 AM |
>America pounding Germany.
America is not how you spell Allied powers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:29 AM |
| most of the countrys in europe was dominated by germany america did some of the bigest hits and the british |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
toonlinx
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4710 |
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:29 AM |
| Sounds like you an 11 year old trying to outsmart people on teh forums |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
omega66x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5690 |
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:30 AM |
Hey look kids! Someone who doesn't know what an opinion is!
I now own the :U face. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:30 AM |
America hardly did any work in Europe. Now on the other hand, they did most of the work in the Pacific. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
omega66x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5690 |
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:31 AM |
(Not referring to you, toon)
I now own the :U face. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:31 AM |
| n00bly america and the british wer pounding germany back country back country till germany was only one left thats when germany got despret adn use old men and young teens to fight |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:33 AM |
Britain never had the fighting spirit it should have had after Dunkirk, so they were pretty much hopeless for most parts of the war.
the US entered too late into World War Two to do real damage in Europe. By the time the US started fighting, the Soviets had already turned the tide and took Berlin within a couple of years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:35 AM |
| I know timebandit is trying to be a troll. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:35 AM |
| n00bly germany sent almsot all of ther eplanes at britien but they killed allthere attacks leading tog ermany haveing no air force then america had the upper hand |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:35 AM |
| With his last post, I now know he is trying to troll. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:36 AM |
| Anyone that mentions a country being better than the other always tries to troll. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
omega66x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5690 |
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:38 AM |
Yep.
I now own the :U face. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 May 2012 12:42 AM |
| i dont try to torll im trying to get it in your head that russia dident realy impack as much s usa in wwII |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|