|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:01 PM |
| The same way Music Theory is just a theory. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
awdosome
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5621 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:02 PM |
| So is Christianity, I just choose to put my faith in Christianity not evolution. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Boeing717
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 08 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 70007 |
|
| |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:03 PM |
| So is gravity, but I don't see you jumping off buildings. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:05 PM |
@Awdosome
You don't put faith into evolution. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:11 PM |
@dinno
There's evidence to support the existence of gravity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Boeing717
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 08 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 70007 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:13 PM |
i jump off buildings all the time man
gravity defying is coolio |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:13 PM |
| As is the Big Bang, an effective Religious war starter. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:14 PM |
@DoctorBroSteve There's also evidence to prove evolution and cell theory, but is it a law? No. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
awdosome
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5621 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:16 PM |
@The guy who said something about jumping off buildings
Wouldn't that be so awkward if he was Neo? c; |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:16 PM |
@Diino
I don't believe you know what the difference from scientific theory and law is. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:18 PM |
@Doctor How ironic, right now in the 4th semester we're going in depth about law and theories. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:19 PM |
@Dii
"4th semester"
A semester is `1/2. What logic does your school run on? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
prind966
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 186 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:20 PM |
| laws can only be applied in mathmatics. theory is the highest anything can get in the physical sciences. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
prind966
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 186 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:21 PM |
| and christianity isnt a theory either........ its a hypothesis not a theory. evolution takes know faith to believe or understand. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:22 PM |
@PRI Chinese school years? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
a9i
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 132 |
|
| |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:24 PM |
@Diino
You don't seem to be grasping the concept. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:25 PM |
Listen.
Religion Wars stop here.
Please, be more mature and move on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
prind966
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 186 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:25 PM |
| yes discussing intellectual topics is immature. how about you get out! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:26 PM |
Trying to force ideas and religion is very mature.
Let me tell you.
And get out of what?
I'm typing, not physically here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:27 PM |
@Doctor
[[ Warning: Gravity is “Only a Theory”
by Ellery Schempp
All physics textbooks should include this warning label:
“This textbook contains material on Gravity. Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.”
The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a “fact,” when in fact it is not even a good theory.
First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star. It is simply a religious belief that it is “universal.” Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, “the moon goes around the earth.” If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun. Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory.
The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity.
There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd. Moreover, if gravity were working on the early earth, then earth would have been bombarded out of existence by falling asteroids, meteors, comets, and other space junk. Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Since everything in the Universe tends to disorder according to the 2nd Law, orderly orbits are impossible. This cannot be resolved by pointing to the huge outpouring of energy from the sun. In fact, it is known that the flux of photons from the sun and the “solar wind” actually tends to push earth away.
There are numerous alternative theories that should be taught on an equal basis. For example, the observed behavior of the earth revolving around the sun can be perfectly explained if the sun has a net positive charge and the planets have a net negative charge, since opposite charges attract and the force is an inverse-square law, exactly as the increasingly discredited Theory of Gravity. Physics and chemistry texts emphasize that this is the explanation for electrons going around the nucleus, so if it works for atoms, why not for the solar system? The answer is simple: scientific orthodoxy.
The US Patent Office has never issued a patent for anti-gravity. Why is this? According to natural law and homeopathy, everything exists in opposites: good-evil; grace-sin; positive charges-negative charges; north poles-south poles; good vibes-bad vibes; etc. We know there are anti-evolutionists, so why not anti-gravitationalists? It is clearly a matter of the scientific establishment elite protecting their own. Anti-gravity papers are routinely rejected from peer-reviewed journals, and scientists who propose anti-gravity quickly lose their funding. Universal gravity theory is just a way to keep the grant money flowing.
Even Isaac Newton, said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with the theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to “prove” his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called “infinitesimals” which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he, too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with “fringe” mathematics. Newton, by the way, was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity. His dabbling in gravity, alchemy, and calculus was a mere sideline, perhaps an aberration best left forgotten in describing his career and faith in a Creator. ]]
...Yeah. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:27 PM |
@Ice
Evolution has nothing do do with religion. It's a topic in biology. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
prind966
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 186 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:28 PM |
| #1 nobody is forcing anything you idiot! how can i force you to do anything on a forum. #2 get out of this forum nobody wants a new age hippie spouting ignorant crap in ot. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 04:28 PM |
| And I believe evolution, not Adam and Eve crap. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|