|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:05 PM |
...over a large time-span.
I feel that they should be, if the inactivity stretches over a month or greater without a valid reason. I base my opinion on this idea: A President is elected in a country, they promise lots of changes for the better, however, once they had been elected they decided not to do anything but instead lay on their backsides. | What would happen to them? They wouldn't remain president for much longer.
What are your ideas?
inb4robloxisntreallife - the same concept still applies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:09 PM |
I agree.
That is what happened to Unit 32 high ranks were inactive so they were demoted.
We are looking for new high ranks at the moment.
[We aren't different, but together, we create difference!] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:11 PM |
| Many respond with the idea that they earned their rank so they should keep it. Once again, think about a president - they earned it however if they don't perform then they will lose it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:11 PM |
Support. They should get replaced by someone who's able to do the job. I know, real life is more important than ROBLOX. Yet, they should've known that before they accepted the promotion. However, if they would have a valid reason for this, I would support the inactive person.
-Confidence is a plant of slow growth in an aged heart- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
glorybox
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 280 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:21 PM |
| De-mo-ted. Oh and by the way baskets... EXPLOITER!!!! NOOB NOOB NOOB !!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:22 PM |
| Basket isn't an exploiter, if you're talking about that parenting.. issue. People just assumed what he mentioned was true. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:23 PM |
It's a clan's owner's decision. Not yours :L
"Less QQ, moar pew pew, boom, bang, exploshionz and trolling" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ScarXD
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10323 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:23 PM |
In my group, ANY Soldier that is inactive for over 2-3 Weeks and doesn't tell me, is exiled. I don't deal with inactive members. My group had 400 members, I exiled all inactive people, got it down to 160 all active people. Worked great.
Guardian Units of Nations,Leader~Scar~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:25 PM |
| I wouldn't exile inactive members. I would only demote high ranks for inactivity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 12:41 PM |
Yeah they should be demoted, If they think as soon as there HR they can get away with being inactive teach them wrong.
{~DevaUSA~ TN Commander} Join Today! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ScarXD
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10323 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:30 PM |
Well AmazingAnt, we all have our own different set of rules. Anyways I wish you the best for your group.
Guardian Units of Nations,Leader~Scar~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kingzeb
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10918 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:40 PM |
Yes, they should be.
This is the problem with many high ranks in UAF.
I brought this up with Shadowsword and Moojl and Owningdutchman on X-Fire last night, and a few seconds later after giving them my long letter, I was promoted to Colonel.
Strange, that wasn't what I was trying to do, it is a real problem. Inactiviness in clan high ranks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:42 PM |
I have a problem with your real-life example...
That's happening right now... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:51 PM |
| You mean Obama? By my example, I mean if they do strictly what I said.. sit on their backsides and do nothing AT all. I'm pretty sure he still does things ;) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
otogon
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 997 |
|
| |
|
Lissitski
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30369 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:54 PM |
| Uh...isn't that how it normally is? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:55 PM |
| Excuse is the wrong word, I prefer.. reason. Excuse implies you did something wrong where as reason is explaining why something had to happen. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Lissitski
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30369 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:57 PM |
Oh dear.
Well, it usually comes down to the Leader. A Leader who exiles someone for being offline for only a week or even a day, is a bad leader. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:58 PM |
| No one should ever be exiled due to inactivity. However I feel high ranks should not retain their rank. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tw424
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 266 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 01:58 PM |
@Imnot Lol .. I aree. we have a president right now thats barely doing anything ... Look where that got us ? We need a really good president to fix the problems with the 'inactive" one. ~Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lissitski
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30369 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 02:01 PM |
Depends on the inactivity.
If it is quitting ROBLOX, or being restricted to play, keep the HR as an Honourary one, like...a Retired HR or a "Relic" (like what RSF is doing with Benblue9 xD).
If it is going on vacation, then they should be active after it.
If they still play, but don't represent any allied clan and don't do any of their HR duties, they should be AT LEAST demoted.
Exiled if they're a really bad HR, like trolling the members, being disobedient, AAing, even though some clans like RSF give second chances.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
InFlames
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Aug 2006 |
| Total Posts: 8779 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 02:03 PM |
| Well I was inactive in JC for a week or two, but I was on C&G defending it against nubs who flame it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 02:03 PM |
"If it is quitting ROBLOX, or being restricted to play, keep the HR as an Honourary one, like...a Retired HR or a "Relic" (like what RSF is doing with Benblue9 xD)."
> restricted to play isn't quite the same, as long as they access roblox from time to time. However if they are quitting roblox then they should be demoted.
"If it is going on vacation, then they should be active after it."
> That's an example of a valid reason for inactivity.
"If they still play, but don't represent any allied clan and don't do any of their HR duties, they should be AT LEAST demoted."
> Should certainly be demoted to the highest non high rank position, but not exiled.
"Exiled if they're a really bad HR, like trolling the members, being disobedient, AAing, even though some clans like RSF give second chances."
> That's not inactivity though, is it? ;) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lissitski
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30369 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 02:07 PM |
@Amazing
Just stating the possible reason for exile, and yes, not for inactivity. Also, since ROBLOX now counts group members leaving, they'll be valuable to keep.
Also, yes, they can come on from time to time, IF they have a regular habit of free time.
If they can't, EVER, like...FOREVER, then something should be done.
Me, I come on weekends. I'm on atm, because I got time to myself ;) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|