|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:44 PM |
I've decided against it. It's only adding more fuel to the fire.
I apologize for that overreaction to RAT - not to SS.
I'm a bit quick to jump to the gun but this is only harming RAT more and I will not do that.
So, RAT, I apologize.
I just hoped that light on WIJ's policy will influence SS to change his mind. If not then your judgement will be your judgement and you can act on it to your own accord.
I've got much superclan support for the removal of the policy. It was also another leader friend of mine convinced me to drop this and instead just protest without making it worse.
Thanks.
-CT |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
| |
|
Bbal
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 6433 |
|
| |
|
Yo911
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9402 |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:45 PM |
| Yay! He came to his senses! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:45 PM |
His policy is legit, yours was an overreaction, and just stupid.
۩The Link۩ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
grimy12
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 13509 |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:46 PM |
| omg, finally ct admits he's wrong, my god it isn't the real ct |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:46 PM |
@altair
We're not ignoring it. We're still going to be vocal about it and our official recognition of WIJ will be hostile.
I'm just not stooping to Silent's level. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:46 PM |
I hope you realise that my policy applies to just my Colonels and above. Which I have 6 of. Look, I'm fine with cj10127 being a Colonel because I trust him enough to be! I hope you see the difference.
-{===>SS |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mage11561
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 13217 |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:46 PM |
| war with WIJ so i can have a reason to raid RAT, but then won't. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Richochet
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 10773 |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:46 PM |
| Now that's a ColourTheory I like. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meto02
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11373 |
|
| |
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:47 PM |
@Colour,
Could you do me a favor and remove UAF from your enemies list? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
battery56
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7232 |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:47 PM |
I think RAT should continue protesting until he removes it.
You should make a protest thread and RAT will keep it bumped up until the policy is gone. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:47 PM |
I find it cute how all the people who hated my policy were neither in RAT nor WIJ and have a history of being nasty to me.
Your opinions are worthless and this apology was not for you. It was for RAT. I don't apologize to WIJ nor do I regret anything I did except for maybe making some RAT members lose WIJ ranks.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:47 PM |
| CT, I think you need to talk to the Admiral personally and get his thoughts and opinions, then meet with SS and see what you can negotiate on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:47 PM |
Reason for WIJ's policy put in place by Mr Swords: To ensure that the High Rank of WIJ is truly loyal and can offer a large percentage of their time.
Reason for your sudden policy: To create an uproar, in the hope of pushing WIJ into a war.
The policy in WIJ is vital to ensure its activeness. There are 6 individuals that are affected by this policy, currently. That's right, 6 high ranks within WIJ - without the policy it wouldn't be as active as it it.
Where as RAT has 24 high ranks (Admirals), which is more than enough to function - even if some of the Admirals are also high ranks within other groups.
Glad you have dropped it, however, you have for the wrong reasons. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:48 PM |
I think that Ant speaks for me.
-{===>SS |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LordWolv
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5862 |
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:48 PM |
@battery
We're going to do something. We're still going to have a major issue with this. I just don't think that making more people choose will solve anything.
This is for dizzdazz and he didn't want anyone else to need to do this and I respect that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Apr 2012 04:49 PM |
| @Rich, makes policy against WIJ, two seconds later removes it. That's the CT we like. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|