generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » ROBLOX Talk
Home Search
 

Re: ROBLOXian Critique: Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:34 PM
http://www.roblox.com/Flaming-Dragon-Slayer-Bo-Staff-item?id=73232786
Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff


The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff...


It's fancy, it looks nice when you use it, but it is ineffective, unless of course your enemy is horribly weak.

I suppose it would be nice to spray into a zombie horde if they are extremely slow or weak, but otherwise it's all looks.

This is a new kind of weapon, a new aged weapon. Superior movement and arm positioning to other weapons, that is.

You hold to attack, or double click and hold on the second click to spray an (extremely weak) blaze upon your enemy, moving at a slower speed while you unleash this pitiful fury of flames.


The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff is weak, and is all show. Good if your just showing off, not attacking. So if your an entrepreneurial gear collector, or a show-off plain and simple, do buy this.

But if your like me, and are all for raw combativeness capabilities, please, I cannot beg enough, do not get this.

It *can* be used for a weapon, do not get me wrong, but for fighting, i'd sooner get the rolling pin or frying pan. Sorry.

The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff

Gets a ★★★☆☆ for pretty colors and movements

But a ★☆☆☆☆ for combat effectiveness
Report Abuse
gopherivv is not online. gopherivv
Joined: 04 May 2008
Total Posts: 5252
12 Apr 2012 10:35 PM
Fifteen starts for going in the toilet then when I flush my cat's poop down the toilet having it shoot up into my eye.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:38 PM
..... what?
Report Abuse
SKULLMANDER is not online. SKULLMANDER
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 11840
12 Apr 2012 10:43 PM
This is RT.
Expect that.
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
12 Apr 2012 10:43 PM
Oh my, can you please write out a review with proper grammar next time? I mean, this is the forums, and we're fairly casual normally. When you write a review, write is properly. 'kay? (:

Strunk & White - The Elements of Style:

Elementary Principles of Composition:

16 Use Definite, specific, concrete language.
17 Omit needless words.
18. Avoid a succession of loose sentences
22 Place the emphatic words of a sentence at the end

An Approach to Style:
1 Place yourself in the background
3 Work from a suitable design
5 Revise and rewrite
6 Do not overwrite
8 Avoid the use of qualifiers
9 Do not affect a breezy manner
11 Do not explain too much
16 Be clear
17 Do not inject opinion
19 Do not take shortcuts at the cost of clarity.

Well, those were the only ones I saw broken in here, out of that book alone, of course.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:44 PM
Can you pick up a dictionary, because my grammar, spelling and word use is just fine, my friend.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:46 PM
And your 'useless' words are meerly for affect and detail, a mind cannot grasp the concept if I just say 'it is bad, do not buy it'

it is a critique, not a child's opinion on a toy.
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
12 Apr 2012 10:46 PM
I just explained to you what rules you just broke from Strunk & White. xD

My oh my, I imagine you learn nothing about journalism in public schools, eh?
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:49 PM
I don't really care what some set of rules from whatever 'Strunk & White' is, considering I've studied journalism and writing all my life, and yet I've never heard of, have to say.


If they aren't well enough to be in the curriculum of 12 years of honors classes, they aren't worth my time.
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
12 Apr 2012 10:53 PM
Of course not, because it is used by the editors of newspapers when looking over the writer's work.

It was the icing on the cake in colleges for several generations. Do you expect it to be in your honor's class? Speaking of which, twelve years? I was unaware that first grade had honor classes. ^^

Chill bro, there is a reason I'm an editor in RoGo, your criticism is simply bad.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:57 PM
I am not all that young, though very good guess. Actually I was considered honors since *second* grade. At first, they presumed me to be autistic, but after a few months of tests, they considered me a genius.

I've been taking college studies since 6th grade, and if it hasn't popped up since then, it is not worth my time.

My critique isn't exactly thought out. I just speak my mind. Hence the point of a forum..

Not to speak in turn to what everyone else wants, rather speak in turn to what I want, as I am the speaker here.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 10:58 PM
To add

in all honesty

I do this out of hobby. I do not plan to be a journalist.
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
12 Apr 2012 11:01 PM
I'm not saying you were.

If you are writing formal critique on the forums, you should keep it formal. Disregarding whether you do it as a hobby or not. Either you will be good at your hobby, or you will be bad at it. Whether you're actually proficient in it is entirely up to you. ^u^
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 11:07 PM
I never said it was formal. Nowhere have I ever typed anything I do is formal.


I wear business suits and successor hair, with fancy shades and a sparkling smile


But not once have I ever said anything about me is formal.


I am a casual man, my friend, and my critiques, all my writings, are as casual as I.


Granted I will not intentionally misspell, or type text-slang such as 2maro or gtg in a forum post or critique, I avoid general slang such as ain't and y'all.

I never said it was formal, though. It's a casual hobby, not a formal stressing business I plan to grow into.

I use my words correctly, spell as accurate as I feel like, and avoid slang. That's as 'formal' as I will get.
Report Abuse
dallaskleven is not online. dallaskleven
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Total Posts: 1298
12 Apr 2012 11:08 PM
The purpose to post my many, daily critiques is to get my personal opinion out there, and let others know if they might enjoy or dislike the many things I do.

Not to pride or shame creations and creators, like an actual critic is meant to.

I just want a word in, my opinion placed out, and most importantly

the general word placed out on an item, place, or person.
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » ROBLOX Talk
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image