|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:34 PM |
http://www.roblox.com/Flaming-Dragon-Slayer-Bo-Staff-item?id=73232786 Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff
The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff...
It's fancy, it looks nice when you use it, but it is ineffective, unless of course your enemy is horribly weak.
I suppose it would be nice to spray into a zombie horde if they are extremely slow or weak, but otherwise it's all looks.
This is a new kind of weapon, a new aged weapon. Superior movement and arm positioning to other weapons, that is.
You hold to attack, or double click and hold on the second click to spray an (extremely weak) blaze upon your enemy, moving at a slower speed while you unleash this pitiful fury of flames.
The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff is weak, and is all show. Good if your just showing off, not attacking. So if your an entrepreneurial gear collector, or a show-off plain and simple, do buy this.
But if your like me, and are all for raw combativeness capabilities, please, I cannot beg enough, do not get this.
It *can* be used for a weapon, do not get me wrong, but for fighting, i'd sooner get the rolling pin or frying pan. Sorry.
The Flaming Dragon Slayer Bo Staff
Gets a ★★★☆☆ for pretty colors and movements
But a ★☆☆☆☆ for combat effectiveness |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
gopherivv
|
  |
| Joined: 04 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5252 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:35 PM |
| Fifteen starts for going in the toilet then when I flush my cat's poop down the toilet having it shoot up into my eye. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:43 PM |
Oh my, can you please write out a review with proper grammar next time? I mean, this is the forums, and we're fairly casual normally. When you write a review, write is properly. 'kay? (:
Strunk & White - The Elements of Style:
Elementary Principles of Composition:
16 Use Definite, specific, concrete language. 17 Omit needless words. 18. Avoid a succession of loose sentences 22 Place the emphatic words of a sentence at the end
An Approach to Style: 1 Place yourself in the background 3 Work from a suitable design 5 Revise and rewrite 6 Do not overwrite 8 Avoid the use of qualifiers 9 Do not affect a breezy manner 11 Do not explain too much 16 Be clear 17 Do not inject opinion 19 Do not take shortcuts at the cost of clarity.
Well, those were the only ones I saw broken in here, out of that book alone, of course. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:44 PM |
| Can you pick up a dictionary, because my grammar, spelling and word use is just fine, my friend. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:46 PM |
And your 'useless' words are meerly for affect and detail, a mind cannot grasp the concept if I just say 'it is bad, do not buy it'
it is a critique, not a child's opinion on a toy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:46 PM |
I just explained to you what rules you just broke from Strunk & White. xD
My oh my, I imagine you learn nothing about journalism in public schools, eh? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:49 PM |
I don't really care what some set of rules from whatever 'Strunk & White' is, considering I've studied journalism and writing all my life, and yet I've never heard of, have to say.
If they aren't well enough to be in the curriculum of 12 years of honors classes, they aren't worth my time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:53 PM |
Of course not, because it is used by the editors of newspapers when looking over the writer's work.
It was the icing on the cake in colleges for several generations. Do you expect it to be in your honor's class? Speaking of which, twelve years? I was unaware that first grade had honor classes. ^^
Chill bro, there is a reason I'm an editor in RoGo, your criticism is simply bad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:57 PM |
I am not all that young, though very good guess. Actually I was considered honors since *second* grade. At first, they presumed me to be autistic, but after a few months of tests, they considered me a genius.
I've been taking college studies since 6th grade, and if it hasn't popped up since then, it is not worth my time.
My critique isn't exactly thought out. I just speak my mind. Hence the point of a forum..
Not to speak in turn to what everyone else wants, rather speak in turn to what I want, as I am the speaker here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 10:58 PM |
To add
in all honesty
I do this out of hobby. I do not plan to be a journalist. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 11:01 PM |
I'm not saying you were.
If you are writing formal critique on the forums, you should keep it formal. Disregarding whether you do it as a hobby or not. Either you will be good at your hobby, or you will be bad at it. Whether you're actually proficient in it is entirely up to you. ^u^ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 11:07 PM |
I never said it was formal. Nowhere have I ever typed anything I do is formal.
I wear business suits and successor hair, with fancy shades and a sparkling smile
But not once have I ever said anything about me is formal.
I am a casual man, my friend, and my critiques, all my writings, are as casual as I.
Granted I will not intentionally misspell, or type text-slang such as 2maro or gtg in a forum post or critique, I avoid general slang such as ain't and y'all.
I never said it was formal, though. It's a casual hobby, not a formal stressing business I plan to grow into.
I use my words correctly, spell as accurate as I feel like, and avoid slang. That's as 'formal' as I will get. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 11:08 PM |
The purpose to post my many, daily critiques is to get my personal opinion out there, and let others know if they might enjoy or dislike the many things I do.
Not to pride or shame creations and creators, like an actual critic is meant to.
I just want a word in, my opinion placed out, and most importantly
the general word placed out on an item, place, or person. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|