generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
We use cookies to offer you a better experience. By using Roblox.com, you are agreeing to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » ROBLOX Talk
Home Search
 

Re: "I joined in 2006/2007, therefore I am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you"

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:37 PM
http://i.imgur.com/HTzNQ.png

Words cannot describe the hate towards these folks. I originally joined in 2007, I want to apologize on behalf of all my brethren with the same join-year.
Report Abuse
Xutus is not online. Xutus
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 1131
23 Mar 2012 10:38 PM
LIARRR
Report Abuse
GOLDENCATUAR is not online. GOLDENCATUAR
Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Total Posts: 18032
23 Mar 2012 10:39 PM
Who does this?
Report Abuse
EMAN381 is not online. EMAN381
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Total Posts: 4300
23 Mar 2012 10:40 PM
Na-na-na-na-na-NAAAH! I am more experience and have a more valid OPINION! Na-na-na-na-na-NAAAH!
Report Abuse
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:41 PM
@GOLDEN

Way too many. My mind's gone blank for examples, but I have experienced a couple. Anyone who bases _any_ of their arguments on joindate/post count is retarded, for that matter.
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
23 Mar 2012 10:41 PM
I joined life on 1996, therefore I am more experienced/have a more sound opinion than you.

Oh wait, I changed valid to sound, because 80% of the people who use that word just think it means that your argument is entirely true, and cannot be refuted. Idiots these days...
Report Abuse
EMAN381 is not online. EMAN381
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Total Posts: 4300
23 Mar 2012 10:41 PM
*experienced
Report Abuse
DynamiteGuy is not online. DynamiteGuy
Joined: 16 May 2008
Total Posts: 11872
23 Mar 2012 10:42 PM
[ Content Deleted ]
Report Abuse
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:42 PM
@Row

i joined in december 1996, so am i equally experienced/have equally valid opinions or am i just a liiiiiiiiiiiittle less valid/experienced than you?

@eman

i genuinely enjoyed that post, i will use it for future arguments on the internet
Report Abuse
EMAN381 is not online. EMAN381
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Total Posts: 4300
23 Mar 2012 10:44 PM
Thank you, sir. My experiences and valid opinions help my fellow folks in time.

That is why people should cherish the knowledge of us egotistical megalomaniacs.
Report Abuse
TheSuperBloxxa is not online. TheSuperBloxxa
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 4484
23 Mar 2012 10:45 PM
Didn't that group "teh pwnerers" have a swearing ad?
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
23 Mar 2012 10:45 PM
@QW1LF February, your argument is 10 months less valid than my own. (:

That, and I have actually studied formal logic, so I know how to make an argument valid and how to pick out ones that are invalid. (:
Report Abuse
snakeboy2846 is not online. snakeboy2846
Joined: 22 May 2008
Total Posts: 7119
23 Mar 2012 10:45 PM
:I Attracting trolls...
Report Abuse
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:46 PM
@TheSuperBloxxa

wasnt swearing it was free speech which you likely know nothing of because you're a despicable chinese imperialist commie
Report Abuse
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:47 PM
"That, and I have actually studied formal logic, so I know how to make an argument valid and how to pick out ones that are invalid. (:"

studying formal logic is the least logical thing you can do, if you want to learn logic just argue with everybody on the internet
Report Abuse
TheSuperBloxxa is not online. TheSuperBloxxa
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 4484
23 Mar 2012 10:47 PM
"wasnt swearing it was free speech which you likely know nothing of because you're a despicable chinese imperialist commie"

I joined in 2006/2007, therefore I am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you
Report Abuse
QW1LF1SH is not online. QW1LF1SH
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Total Posts: 2168
23 Mar 2012 10:48 PM
@TheSuper

i was born in MURRIKKA therefore i am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you
Report Abuse
TheSuperBloxxa is not online. TheSuperBloxxa
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 4484
23 Mar 2012 10:49 PM
In addition to my last post: You are trying way too hard
Report Abuse
ChefSolo is not online. ChefSolo
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Total Posts: 676
23 Mar 2012 10:49 PM
[ Content Deleted ]
Report Abuse
TheSuperBloxxa is not online. TheSuperBloxxa
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 4484
23 Mar 2012 10:49 PM
"i was born in MURRIKKA therefore i am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you"

Estonia sucks.
Report Abuse
moderrncombat is not online. moderrncombat
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Total Posts: 2623
23 Mar 2012 10:51 PM
I joined life in 1996 aswell

Intelligent or Humourous Me
Report Abuse
Rowpunk is not online. Rowpunk
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 7387
23 Mar 2012 11:05 PM
Arguments on the internet are usually completely idiotic. I simply use it to make my papers nicer. Syllogisms are awesome. (: And of course, having knowledge on the informal fallacies tends to work well.

But yeah, on the internet, people argue about the material in the argument. And they use only what they know, and what contradicts what the other person is saying. Making this argument end 100% quicker:

Henry: Educated people take no stock in any traditional religious concepts.

James: But I know some college graduates, even some Ph.D.'s who do.

Henry: I said educated. They are not really educated or else they wouldn't.

See? With that kind of answer and dealing with only material, you have to refute his entire statement about people affiliating themselves with traditional religious concepts not having any education. When in reality you could simply point out that deduction doesn't work like that, and that he's simply begging the question, and avoiding the facts, instead of actually replying to your counter.

It forces them to either be stubborn, and continue to ignore the argument, in which case you simply bring up a causal remark saying something along the lines of "Oh, I suppose you don't have anything to back that up, since you're simply dodging about on that topic."

Or, it forces them to give your their reasoning, and any flaws that may be with it. (: MuchmuchmuchMUCH easier, and the average idiot would reply to your long post with an equally as long post...Which just takes what you said word-by-word and simply nitpicks at your counter, then expects you to reply to their nitpicking.
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » ROBLOX Talk
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image