QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:37 PM |
http://i.imgur.com/HTzNQ.png
Words cannot describe the hate towards these folks. I originally joined in 2007, I want to apologize on behalf of all my brethren with the same join-year. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Xutus
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1131 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
EMAN381
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 4300 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:40 PM |
| Na-na-na-na-na-NAAAH! I am more experience and have a more valid OPINION! Na-na-na-na-na-NAAAH! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:41 PM |
@GOLDEN
Way too many. My mind's gone blank for examples, but I have experienced a couple. Anyone who bases _any_ of their arguments on joindate/post count is retarded, for that matter. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:41 PM |
I joined life on 1996, therefore I am more experienced/have a more sound opinion than you.
Oh wait, I changed valid to sound, because 80% of the people who use that word just think it means that your argument is entirely true, and cannot be refuted. Idiots these days... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EMAN381
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 4300 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:42 PM |
@Row
i joined in december 1996, so am i equally experienced/have equally valid opinions or am i just a liiiiiiiiiiiittle less valid/experienced than you?
@eman
i genuinely enjoyed that post, i will use it for future arguments on the internet |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EMAN381
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 4300 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:44 PM |
Thank you, sir. My experiences and valid opinions help my fellow folks in time.
That is why people should cherish the knowledge of us egotistical megalomaniacs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:45 PM |
| Didn't that group "teh pwnerers" have a swearing ad? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:45 PM |
@QW1LF February, your argument is 10 months less valid than my own. (:
That, and I have actually studied formal logic, so I know how to make an argument valid and how to pick out ones that are invalid. (: |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:46 PM |
@TheSuperBloxxa
wasnt swearing it was free speech which you likely know nothing of because you're a despicable chinese imperialist commie |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:47 PM |
"That, and I have actually studied formal logic, so I know how to make an argument valid and how to pick out ones that are invalid. (:"
studying formal logic is the least logical thing you can do, if you want to learn logic just argue with everybody on the internet |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:47 PM |
"wasnt swearing it was free speech which you likely know nothing of because you're a despicable chinese imperialist commie"
I joined in 2006/2007, therefore I am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
QW1LF1SH
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2168 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:48 PM |
@TheSuper
i was born in MURRIKKA therefore i am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:49 PM |
| In addition to my last post: You are trying way too hard |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ChefSolo
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 676 |
|
| |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:49 PM |
"i was born in MURRIKKA therefore i am more experienced/have a more valid opinion than you"
Estonia sucks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 10:51 PM |
I joined life in 1996 aswell
Intelligent or Humourous Me |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rowpunk
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7387 |
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 11:05 PM |
Arguments on the internet are usually completely idiotic. I simply use it to make my papers nicer. Syllogisms are awesome. (: And of course, having knowledge on the informal fallacies tends to work well.
But yeah, on the internet, people argue about the material in the argument. And they use only what they know, and what contradicts what the other person is saying. Making this argument end 100% quicker:
Henry: Educated people take no stock in any traditional religious concepts.
James: But I know some college graduates, even some Ph.D.'s who do.
Henry: I said educated. They are not really educated or else they wouldn't.
See? With that kind of answer and dealing with only material, you have to refute his entire statement about people affiliating themselves with traditional religious concepts not having any education. When in reality you could simply point out that deduction doesn't work like that, and that he's simply begging the question, and avoiding the facts, instead of actually replying to your counter.
It forces them to either be stubborn, and continue to ignore the argument, in which case you simply bring up a causal remark saying something along the lines of "Oh, I suppose you don't have anything to back that up, since you're simply dodging about on that topic."
Or, it forces them to give your their reasoning, and any flaws that may be with it. (: MuchmuchmuchMUCH easier, and the average idiot would reply to your long post with an equally as long post...Which just takes what you said word-by-word and simply nitpicks at your counter, then expects you to reply to their nitpicking. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|