Jinxy
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Aug 2007 |
| Total Posts: 18317 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:32 AM |
| Recently, it was stated to me "Iran wishse to invade Israel." My question is so what? Explain to me why it's my problem that Iran invades Israel, and while you're at it, explain to me why we shouldn't allow Iran to have nuke power. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Riffdis
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1345 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:44 AM |
| If Iran invades Isreal, it will start a religious readical outbreak. This an since US is on side with Isreal, and China is on side with Iran, you could guess there is going to be some tention. If Iran gets a hold of nuclear warheads then World War 3 will outbreak, so to say. Iran is run by anti-western radicals, so this would not be a good thing for much of western Europe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jinxy
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Aug 2007 |
| Total Posts: 18317 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:45 AM |
| Says who? Fearful tin hat wearing uninformed or fear mongers? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 06:38 AM |
I agree with riffidff on the fact that WW3 is really near. Right now, tensions have risen ALOT between Iran, Israel, US, and China. All those countries have nuclear weapons. If tension continues, it will eventually pop and WW3 starts. End of humankind - due to a debate.
Leave their religion to them. Leave your religion to you.
"Knowledge talks, wisdom listens." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:14 PM |
I agree with riffidff on the fact that WW3 is really near. Right now, tensions have risen ALOT between Iran, Israel, US, and China. All those countries have nuclear weapons. If tension continues, it will eventually pop and WW3 starts. End of humankind - due to a debate.
---
WW3 is highly unlikely.
If Iran will get nukes, it will start a nuclear arms race, but nobody will throw them at eachother. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:18 PM |
| Nuclear weapons will never, ever be used again in warfare. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 12:34 PM |
| The US was soft enough to use them in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 02:26 PM |
| Shut the hell up about WWIII, every single leader in the world in this modern age understands that waging such a war would never result in victory for ANYONE, but an unprecedented global economic collapse which would threaten the stability of the developed world; furthermore, NO nation will EVER use nuclear weapons- it is completely self sacrificial, which is pointless. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Riffdis
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1345 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 02:34 PM |
| @yobobo: The world is so connected, that isocalism can't exist anymore. Thus saying, any mini war could be a world war. Infact the Korean war could be considerd a world war because there were nations from all parts of the world involved. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 02:56 PM |
That's bull, the Korean War was a war fought in one country, a world war involved the deaths of millions of people and war ALL over the world.
The last world wars were fought on nets of alliances and expansionism which simply do not exist in such a form as seen in the ultra- nationalist Europe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Riffdis
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1345 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 03:30 PM |
| So now you saying every war is now a civil war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 03:35 PM |
"So now you saying every war is now a civil war."
wat |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
| |
|
Riffdis
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1345 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 08:29 PM |
| Your practicly saying the world is all one nation, therefore a civil war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 08:32 PM |
China and Russia have both stop supporting Iran in recent months.
If they were really supporting, you would see Chinese/Russian soldiers in Iran and increased munitions shipments.
Infact, WW3 is not that large of a chance. It seems that Russia is most likely on the outbreak of a civil war/revolution and Ahmadinejad has lost the election so he doesn't have much time left in office. China knows better to attack an important economic ally (USA) and Israel knows the US wont support it if there is a surprise strike we aren't ready for. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jinxy
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Aug 2007 |
| Total Posts: 18317 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 09:03 PM |
| This isn't abou WWWIII, folks. This is about why Iran shouldn't have nukes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
signaal2
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4234 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 09:05 PM |
| Iran invades? USA joins and beats iran |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jinxy
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Aug 2007 |
| Total Posts: 18317 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 09:07 PM |
| I'm asking SO WHAT if Iran invades, why does the US care? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 09:39 PM |
| So you can say so what if iran invades israel, and I can't say so what if NZ is part of the commonwealth. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jinxy
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Aug 2007 |
| Total Posts: 18317 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2012 09:43 PM |
| I do not understand what you are trying to say. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|