|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:18 PM |
You are elected mayor of your city. What are the three things you would do. 1. 2. 3.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:20 PM |
1.Anarchy 2.Anarchy 3.Anarchy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:26 PM |
1.Establish democracy in DrCaneJr's city 2.Establish democracy in DrCaneJr's city 3.Establish democracy in DrCaneJr's city
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:30 PM |
1. Shoot democratic leader 2. Take city back 3. Establish Anarchy and make sure it stays that way |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:31 PM |
| Too bad it would not stay that way. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:33 PM |
| An AK-47 round to the stomach can do a lot bro. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:34 PM |
| Yeah, Its certaintly putting down revolts in Syria- Oh wait, Its on the verge of all out civil war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:35 PM |
| Why would I want to put the revolts in Syria down? Branch you do understand this is a SCENARIO stop turning everything into a bash Anarchy thread. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:36 PM |
Quit bringing Anarchy into every thread then? Just saying.
I connected the fact that you saying a AK does a lot when its clearly not doing alot in Syria. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:37 PM |
>Quit bringing Anarchy into every thread then? Just saying. ---------- A SCENARIO THREAD JESUS. The Idea was what would I DO. Holy god.
>I connected the fact that you saying a AK does a lot when its clearly not doing alot in Syria. ---------- It will do a lot to the rebel army and/or the government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:42 PM |
>It will do a lot to the rebel army and/or the government.
If anything, It motivates them seeing theyre comrade mowed down for no reason then "keeping the anarchy". If anything that is opressive, Is it not?
>A SCENARIO THREAD JESUS. The Idea was what would I DO. Holy god.
Relax dude. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:43 PM |
>If anything, It motivates them seeing theyre comrade mowed down for no reason then "keeping the anarchy". If anything that is opressive, Is it not? ------------------- Is it oppressive to take a mans land away because he lacks the money to pay the government when it is their fault he has no job?
>Relax dude. -------------------- I am extremely pissed for multiple reasons. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:46 PM |
>Is it oppressive to take a mans land away because he lacks the money to pay the government when it is their fault he has no job?
Isn't it oppresive to take a mans right away to form a proper government? If he doesn't want to live in a anarchist society, He can just create a government. Its just your choice if you want to move into his same zone which he controls. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:46 PM |
>Isn't it oppresive to take a mans right away to form a proper government? If he doesn't want to live in a anarchist society, He can just create a government. Its just your choice if you want to move into his same zone which he controls. ----------------------- Somalia is what you get when people try to form government in Anarchy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:54 PM |
| Key word in what I said is what happens. Somalia was an Anarchy, now it has warlords. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2012 11:59 PM |
| It was never a anarchy, There was always a government there |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
| |
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:03 AM |
| Define anarchy? How can there be total anarchy with a government in place? Just because the government doesn't have the means to administrate its land doesn't mean its anarchy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:05 AM |
| Parts of Somalia... were an anarchy... now they are controlled... by warlords.... Even if Somalia wasn't an anarchy at one point, warlords take over. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:06 AM |
Warlords are still a proper form of administration
Parts of Somalia were never in a anarchy, Someone had always controlled them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:09 AM |
>Warlords are still a proper form of administration -------------------------------------------------------- Death and suffering is a proper form of administration? I would HATE to see what an improper form of administration is.
>Parts of Somalia were never in a anarchy, Someone had always controlled them. -------------------------------------------------------- ht tp://e n.wik iped ia.or g/wiki/His tory_of_Som alia_%281991%E 2%80%932006%2 9 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:12 AM |
A stateless society doesn't mean someone is not ruling over the area for god's sake.
>Death and suffering is a proper form of administration? I would HATE to see what an improper form of administration is.
You do know the definition of warlord, right? "A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority."
Where does it say they have to kill and murder? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:15 AM |
>A stateless society doesn't mean someone is not ruling over the area for god's sake. ------------------------------- That is not Anarchy, that is called Communist-Anarchy.
>Where does it say they have to kill and murder? ------------------------------- Look at Africa or any other country that has warlords, real f****** winner of a country. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2012 12:17 AM |
>Look at Africa or any other country that has warlords, real f****** winner of a country.
But you were implying that warlords throughout history have always been this bad. A example of good warlords with honor were the Japanese.
>That is not Anarchy, that is called Communist-Anarchy.
So Anarchy has never existed in Somalia? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|