|
| 29 Feb 2012 10:41 PM |
| Because I just saw a chevron ad that said that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Feb 2012 10:45 PM |
The most efficient/clean source.
Oil is more efficient, but less clean.
Wind is more clean, but less efficient. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Feb 2012 10:46 PM |
| So huge wind farms or natural gas? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 01:55 AM |
| Nuclear Fission ,or if you're wishing to stretch it's current capabilities, Nuclear Fusion |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 02:10 AM |
| Nuclear fusion is solar power |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 02:14 AM |
| Solar Power is the harnessing of sunlight, fusion power is the creation of a sun and harnessing the power from it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 02:42 AM |
| I dont see how natural gas could be the cleanest as it needs to be burnt to harness the energy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
smrty
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 600 |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 06:40 AM |
| Cleanest is solar power. I find that it isn't strong enough though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 06:46 AM |
| Nope. Hydro is the most efficient, and most clean. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
smrty
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 600 |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 06:51 AM |
| Hydro is my third favorite source of power after nuclear and oil. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2012 01:24 PM |
| Production of solar panels requires hazardous materials I believe and hydroelectric messes up the ecosystem around the river SOO badly... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:15 PM |
I believe when natural gas burns all it produces is water. I think. But nat.gas is not my favorite I personally think hydro is best. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:18 PM |
Burning a hydrocarbon always produces carbon dioxide and water, not just water.
Burning hydrogen only produces water. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:24 PM |
OMG. That's hydro electric. I thought it was something way different. When will there be cars that run if this stuff. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:25 PM |
Hydrogen was actually used in cars.
Then they realized what happened if you got into a car accident.
Goodbye town. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:28 PM |
A small tank containing hydrogen rupturing and exploding wouldn't destroy an entire town...
Only the car itself, probably much less violently than a conventional car explosion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:31 PM |
| But either way, being incinerated in a car accident isn't exactly a selling point, unless you say "At least you will die fast in the accident" when you are selling the car to the customer. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:32 PM |
| Oh that's unfortunate. Isn't there some ways to turn water into energy? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:32 PM |
Hydrogen+ 30's Plastic Bag= bad Hindenburg! Hydrogen+ 21st century technology= green cars, just a but dull... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:32 PM |
| It's no less safer than a petroleum or diesel car. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:33 PM |
I heard Priuses are horrid in accidents, you burn to death covered in some kind of gel?
Probably just an exoneration. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:34 PM |
| Theoretically you could produce safe, clean drinking water from the 'exhaust' pipe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Yobobo10
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3711 |
|
|
| 02 Mar 2012 02:35 PM |
| The only downside of Hydrogen from a safety view is you have to transport it, treat it and transfer it from tank to tank without it making contact with the atmosphere, which can be a bit of a pain with explosive results |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|