|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:26 PM |
I mean, Communism killed more people...
Mao alone killed over 11 million, The Socialist Rep. of Vietnam killed 2 million, the North Koreans killed 2 million, and the true number of people killed by the Soviet Union will never really be known, but is estimated at over 9 million.
You know who only killed 6 million, not saying he wasn't messed up.
Fascism is Wrong, Communism is Wrong, The world has problems.
I do not support either. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:28 PM |
| Lolbump, posting on OT as well. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:34 PM |
| England alone killed more then the Communists. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:36 PM |
Lets take it from the same number of time then.. 110 years, 1837 - 1947 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zct32
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 701 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:39 PM |
Mao alone killed over 11 million, The Socialist Rep. of Vietnam killed 2 million, the North Koreans killed 2 million, and the true number of people killed by the Soviet Union will never really be known, but is estimated at over 9 million. ______________________________
Totalitarian dictators killed those people. Not communism. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:41 PM |
Communism allways has to be Totalitarian.
Otherwise the system breaks down. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:42 PM |
Aaron has a great point.
But England wasn't fascist. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Warrab
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:42 PM |
Fascism doesn't kill people. Communism doesn't kill people. Guns don't kill people.
PEOPLE kill people. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:43 PM |
"But England wasn't fascist." And the Soviet Union wasn't Communist. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:45 PM |
Yet it was Stalinist, a form of Communist GVT.
Next
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zct32
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 701 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:46 PM |
Communism allways has to be Totalitarian. _______________________________________
That's stalinism. It's basically totalitarianism.
Communism has no state. The Soviet Union, Mao, Vietnam; all had goverments or people trying to assume the power of the goverment, therefore they weren't communist.
And yes, that disqualifies Somalia from being an anarchy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:48 PM |
Communism has no state. The Soviet Union, Mao, Vietnam; all had goverments or people trying to assume the power of the goverment, therefore they weren't communist. ------ Mao, if he fixed just a few little things- like executing Deng Xiaoping, could have easily gotten the closest humanity has ever seen. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zct32
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 701 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:50 PM |
Mao, if he fixed just a few little things- like executing Deng Xiaoping, could have easily gotten the closest humanity has ever seen. __________________________
But he chose to be a dictator. They only took on the moniker of "communist" to appeal to people. They weren't even close.
It would be like George Bush saying he was black so he could get the black vote. Except it worked. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Warrab
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:52 PM |
| Pol Pot came the closest. He evacuated the cities and created a new farming civiliazation. He abolished currency and the whole lot. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
zct32
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 701 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:54 PM |
Pol Pot came the closest. He evacuated the cities and created a new farming civiliazation. He abolished currency and the whole lot. _______________________
Ehhh. The whole over-bearing state thins is still an issue. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Warrab
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:54 PM |
| Yes, it is. But he still came teh closest. That isn't saying much. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 01:58 PM |
| Pol Pot evacuated the cities because of the Vietnam-Cambodian War, and put more people into farming because there was no industry. That might be a reason. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
History0
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1679 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 02:43 PM |
"Fascism doesn't kill people. Communism doesn't kill people. Guns don't kill people. PEOPLE kill people."
I don't how much much, nor do I want to discuss it, but I'm sure that a person is more willing to attack someone else if they have/are more power(ful). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jagex88
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1392 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 04:18 PM |
Idealogies can't directly killed people, people have to carry out the horrid and sordid acts IN THE NAME OF that Ideal. This is Similar with guns, A gun can't shoot someone on its own, something has to pull the trigger. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MajorTyco
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1989 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 04:36 PM |
>Re: Why is Fascism looked on as more 'evil' then Communism?
Because it is. You're doing it wrong.
--"Authority does not know the answer until it is questioned." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 04:41 PM |
| Fascism isn't intrinsically evil you know, at least to a communist. It's all about collectivism. But in a different way. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 05:29 PM |
USSR was NOT Communist, COD gafs.
It was a Socialist state (Hence the United Soviet SOCIALIST Republic) aiming at a working form of Communism. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 06:14 PM |
| Fascism didn't kill people. Racial mixing of politics killed people...which is going on in Tripoli at this moment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|