Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 07:19 AM |
This is incredible. I grow increasingly sickened by the thought of animals being killed in slaugherhouses, with meat pumped with hormones and medicines being sold on to consumers.
Finally, we have synthetic meat, pure, without chemicals pumped into it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Jagex88
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1392 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 07:22 AM |
Next: VACUMORPHS!
Also, I oppose Factory Farming, it is cruel, and takes all natural flavor from the meat. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 07:25 AM |
This is a massive step forward. You could create meat from all types of animals theoretically, even endangered ones. So much opportunity! New tastes, new experiences.
Factory farming is disgusting. I try not to eat meat when I can avoid it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:08 AM |
| I hear bengal tiger tastes exactly like loggerhead turtle. Now I can find out! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:11 AM |
| You could eat human flesh without the guilt and shame. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:25 AM |
| What guilt and shame associated with cannibalism? I didn't know there was any. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:28 AM |
>Synthetic
>Pure without chemicals
u funny kid, i kill u last |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:29 AM |
| I dobn't really think you know what synthesis means. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:31 AM |
Any food made in a lab is nasty.
Besides, you think you can afford £250,000 for one burger?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:53 AM |
| Synthetic? As in 0% real meat? I'll eat cheap and brutal brasilian beef instead. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 08:59 AM |
WTF. WHO WOULD FKIN EAT SYNTHETIC BURGERS.
Chemicals? Seriously guys? I bet in the next 50 ~ 250 years every food we have is synthetic. Year by year, our food supply has gotten ridiculously unhealthy.
"Knowledge talks, wisdom listens." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:14 AM |
| i only eat endangered dolphins |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:15 AM |
Synthetic only means man made. It's the same meat without the suffering, without the antibiotics and the hormones.
It's safer to eat. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:17 AM |
If anything is unhealthy, it's factory farming.
Synthetic meat is not 'unhealthy' - meat produced from factory farming, which is what you eat in a day to day meal, is incredibly unhealthy, toxic in fact. It's just pumped full of steroids, antibiotics, hormones and other nasties. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:18 AM |
Man-Made meat? So, they'll have to either sacrifice a man or a dead man in order to produce meat. Good tip for making money, destructive path on the way of human breakdown.
"Knowledge talks, wisdom listens." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:23 AM |
| Uhh... How can it be meat if its not part of an animal? WTF IS IT?!?!? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:24 AM |
Who said anything about sacrificing a man? We're talking about bovine meat. What do you think is better? Reproducing and eating a piece of meat which is healthy and nutritious, whereby it was produced without any living animal feeling pain, or eating a slice of toxic beef filled with antibiotics not safe for human consumption, from a cow that was kept in awful conditions its whole life then slaughtered through a metallic punch through the head, where its brain is removed from the hole while its body is still squirming and spasming?
I know which one I would pick. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:26 AM |
| I dont really care about the animal, it was raised to die, i wonder why they dont genetically engineer the cows to be zombies... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:26 AM |
But it IS part of an animal! Meat is just a clump of cells, and that's all it is! The only difference is that it didn't come from an animal which was previously alive.
There is honestly no noticeable difference. None at all. It's the same meat, the same taste, the same species. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Person299
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7952 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 09:57 AM |
| Who wants to bet that that crap will be full of carbonyls? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 10:01 AM |
Carbonyls? The functional group C=O that can't exist on its own, which is present in hundreds of different chemicals, some of which exist naturally in every living entity?
What are you talking about? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Person299
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7952 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 10:02 AM |
| I'm saying it's going to have improperly bound molecules in it that are gonna mess up your digestive tract. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryplayer
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 6484 |
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 10:04 AM |
What is an improperly bound molecule? o.o
To put what your trying to say into perspective, Carbon Dioxide has a carbonyl group:
O=C=O |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 10:07 AM |
Nutritious? Our body would reject the shock. Thus making us sick. Natural stuff are always better than synthetic stuff. That's the truth. Of course, in terms of nutritional value. I could agree to synthetic materials, but food? That's just crap.
"Knowledge talks, wisdom listens." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|