|
| 08 Feb 2012 04:34 PM |
"He" (Rothbard) "thinks that "their claim would still be no more than the boundary itself, and not to any of the land within, for only the boundary will have been transformed and used by men" However, if the boundary is private property and the owner refuses others permission to cross it, then the enclosed land is inaccessible to others!"
From here: http://anarchism.pageabo de.com/afaq/secF4.html#secf41 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2012 04:39 PM |
Why wouldn't you support anarchy?
The government has the ability to do whatever it wants whenever it wants.
So some form of government could limit, how you learn, what you learn, what you can do, where you can go, what you can say, what you can own, etc.
Learn what anarchy is before you bash it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Feb 2012 04:40 PM |
1) Why are you talking about Anarchy? 2) Derp. People would form towns with mutual defense, either that or they would hire private security forces. And before you claim that they could just attack you, remember that people would stop trusting them and therefore would hire other companies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2012 04:47 PM |
1) I'm willing to defend my beliefs 2) In a nutshell yes |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Feb 2012 04:51 PM |
| That was not directed at you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
| |
|