|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:14 PM |
| Would you prefer (in America) a two-party system that isn't necessarily so efficient, or a one-party setup that's likely much more efficient in passing legislation? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:15 PM |
| Two party, if it can't be anarchy then i would rather have a split system so now there is some competition. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:24 PM |
| I agree, a one-party would allow government to pass ANY law they want. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Avogadro
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4011 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:32 PM |
| The less the government gets done the better. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:39 PM |
| It would be more, because now that one party can pass any law they want without much opposition inside the government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Avogadro
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4011 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:40 PM |
| No, it would just lead to more laws being passed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:45 PM |
| True, but now they can appeal any law they chose to with little opposition. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Avogadro
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4011 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:46 PM |
| I dunno. I don't trust any parties though. The Republicans passed a new Medicare entitlement without paying for it when they had both houses and the Presidency. I don't trust them to cut spending. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Avogadro
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4011 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 08:53 PM |
| I'd like to see what happens, but the country would probably fall apart. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:08 PM |
| Wait if the country fell apart and that led to anarchy... Hm.... Do I want to be on the morally correct side, or my side?... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pepper0
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 12032 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:14 PM |
two-party system represents the people more.
One-party systems only represents the party, then could lead to a tyranny.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:16 PM |
How about the citizens of the US actually got off their motor scooters, grabbed a firearm, and marched on Washington to enforce the constitution.
They broke their end of the bargain, now we break our loyalty to them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:36 PM |
>How about the citizens of the US actually got off their motor scooters, grabbed a firearm, and marched on Washington to enforce the constitution.
Yeah, Then watch as we get ripped apart by our own armed forces.
So many things could happen... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DrCaneJr
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4970 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:43 PM |
| A revolution would probably cause the thing so many people hate, anarchy. Are you going to follow the "rules" during a rebellion?... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:53 PM |
Like soldiers would be willing to fire on those who want to protect freedom.
And if they do, NO FLY ZONE! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Branch14
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5383 |
|
|
| 06 Feb 2012 10:55 PM |
| Who would enforce a no fly zone? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|