Kyle25
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 3154 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 03:45 PM |
(I'm sure I've made a post like this twice before, and I've refined my opinion each time, this time, it's a new slate since I can't remember)
I've realised that most people base superclans on how many members they have. While this is partly true, this isn't the only think that defines a superclan. Many things contribute to what a superclan is, and here is my opinion on what makes a clan, a superclan.
--Members--
Yes, this is one out of a few parts of a superclan. A superclan will have many members to fight for them and support them. In my opinion, the member count for a superclan should be 10000~, not being too tight on the count. This on it's own eliminates many contenders, and you're thinking that this is it. Wrong, onto the next boundary.
--Activeness--
Sure, the clan has a lot of members, but are they active enough? I define "active" as having 3 trainings and 1 raid a day, while having at least 1 HR meeting per fortnight. Activeness is an important role in a clan as it attracts more members for the clan to grow. Activeness helps a clan become a superclan.
--Popularity--
Doesn't matter what kind of popularity it is, it's vital to getting your clan known, one way or another. If you get good popularity, you'll get members, builders and scripters wanting to join your group freely. However, if you get bad popularity, you will get some members thinking what's so bad about the clan, and possibly staying. Either one should be needed for expanding your clan into a superclan.
--Corruptive--
A superclan isn't really "super" if it's leader and/or HR's are corrupt with greed and power. This hurts the clans popularity and activeness, meaning less members coming in and more members coming out, and is unstable for a superclan.
--Bases--
As stupid as this sounds, I think that superclans should have at least 3 bases to be considered a superclan. This way, a raider has choices as to which base to raid, and also this keeps the clan active as they have to protect all 3 bases. However, if 2 of the 3 bases is empty and never used, then the clan can't be considered as a superclan.
--Wars--
If a clan doesn't have a war every 2 months or so, I would consider it as inactive, and not a superclan, as superclans need a few wars every once in a while to keep members attracted and active. However, too many wars within a short period of time would be considered corrupt, just using your power to attack anyone.
I'm lenient, and if a clan doesn't have ONE of these, they could still be considered a superclan in my opinion.
[[[THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION, DON'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY UNLESS YOU REALLY WANT TO]]]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
022609
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 13226 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Kyle25
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 3154 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 03:51 PM |
@022
yeh
@iPwned
tl;dr? ga;sb |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8SunTzu8
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8199 |
|
| |
|
DieSoft
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 17635 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 03:57 PM |
Super clans = Tons of future possible elite builders/scripters being sucked into big balls, smashing in to eachother. Lets say that the actual "clan world" of ROBLOX take up so much time that you don't try to learn how to build/script well. Those that actualy are really good builders, were once players of games that had building tools. I can say, that everyone I know and knew from the BRF times, are expert builders and scripters.
BRFers > Learns how to build/script > Good places
Clan members > Running around at bases > Low quality places
The ones that actualy build and script good stuff, ain't orginally from the clan world. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 03:57 PM |
super clan = clan that is considered big
that simple
-{===>SS |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
022609
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 13226 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 03:58 PM |
so i can consider fat people supermembers
~swag muscles |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8SunTzu8
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8199 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 04:00 PM |
This is a fantasy of what you wish a superclan was.
In reality, a major world power is not perfect, and you should not consider a super clan as an idealistic thing. It is not.
I do not think there is any superclan that could fit them all, and I am sure many would miss a couple.
If you understand what the meaning of corrupt really is, then really, a lot of clans might lose that, and many other aspects.
Influence is also an important factor. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8SunTzu8
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8199 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 04:02 PM |
I played a game made before BRF before joining a clan, first game I ever played.
People sucked at building there, I eventually became an Admin, then Admin broke, then I got deleted once it was fixed.
So... -_-
(Owner does not log on that often).
I play BRF with a friend a lot when I have time, and I have spent a lot of time there, even in the clan world. I joined the clan world early. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kyle25
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 3154 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 04:02 PM |
@Sun
I realised that some clans may not get all of them but all but one of them, so I'm lenient on those clans.
This is my opinion, don't argue over it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8SunTzu8
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8199 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 07:35 PM |
Not trying to...
I am just saying this is nothing like what superclans are.
Influence, general recognition, normally large, sovereign. Things of those sorts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 07:41 PM |
i agree with my leader
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
yes buttkissery ftw |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|