|
| 07 Jan 2012 09:57 AM |
Which one do you guys recommend?
[I need to learn an Algorithm to deal with noobs.] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 10:05 AM |
| Command line with a good programming editor like Emacs or Vim is the best, but if you want an IDE, then I suggest Eclipse. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bubby4j
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1831 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Flurite
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 5386 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 10:29 AM |
I use QTCreator suggested by myrkos, but I don't think you can program in C there
~Flurite |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LocalChum
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6906 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 11:03 AM |
| Visual Studio for design, then compile with Open Watcom to make an .EXE file with no dependencies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bubby4j
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1831 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 11:06 AM |
| Oh wow, that's a good idea person299. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1Ra
|
  |
| Joined: 02 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2400 |
|
| |
|
Legend26
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 10586 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 11:56 AM |
| I personally prefer Visual Studio Express 2010. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bubby4j
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1831 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 11:59 AM |
For command line applications, I prefer code::blocks For windows applications, Visual Studio is pretty good. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
stravant
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 2893 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:16 PM |
| I see I've successfully purged all of the remaining DevC++ holdouts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:17 PM |
| Congratulations! But eww. Windows. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:17 PM |
X_X for some reason I can't seem to be able to install the MingGW compiler correctly. I'm currently waiting for a reply on the official C::B forum but it seems to take a while. I tried on Eclipse and C::B and nothing. Any help?
[I need to learn an Algorithm to deal with noobs.] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LocalChum
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6906 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:23 PM |
@RATEX
Try sf/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get-inst/mingw-get-inst-20111118/mingw-get-inst-20111118.exe/download |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:25 PM |
It usually takes me a while to find out what these things means, but this time I understood it, thanks.
[I need to learn an Algorithm to deal with noobs.] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:42 PM |
Personally, I use mingw in command line when I'm on Windows and gcc when I'm on GNU/Linux.
It's the way that works best. I use Emacs or Gedit to write applications and I compile them with gcc and tada, a nice application! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
stravant
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 2893 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:45 PM |
| Using the command line nothing beats Clang. Nicely syntax colored and organized, as well as intelligent error output. It's even smart enough to do stuff like insert obviously missing semi-colons and keep compiling intelligently rather than just falling on it's face and stopping the compile. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
myrkos
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8072 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:48 PM |
| I usually program on Ubuntu where I have a variety of text editors (Gedit, Sublime Text, Emacs, GVim, etc. What I use depends on my mood at that time.) and compile with like, the latest version of GCC. Then I have some mercurial repository where I sync my stuff and download it on my Mac and Windows computers to compile the program there too. I use makefiles, but I'm thinking on switching to CMake. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
myrkos
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8072 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 12:51 PM |
| And Clang is nice, but it doesn't support C++11 initializer lists >:( |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 01:28 PM |
"And Clang is nice, but it doesn't support C++11 initializer lists >:("
And its C++ library support on Windows is poor </3 I like it when I'm on Ubuntu though, it compiled itself faster than GCC could compile it <3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
stravant
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 2893 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 01:41 PM |
| Yeah, it needs to catch up a bit, but if you're just throwing together something that doesn't need much fancy C++11 stuff you can use it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
NVI
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4744 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 01:52 PM |
| Heheh, people using C++. Java is so much cleaner. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 02:09 PM |
| @NVI : That strongly depends on your programming style. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Fl0x
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5169 |
|
|
| 07 Jan 2012 02:38 PM |
| I find Java... disgusting. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LocalChum
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6906 |
|
| |
|